Email

A Solution for North America’s Natural Gas Surplus

by | published November 2nd, 2010

Dear Oil & Energy Investor,

Sometimes the most important impact on a raw material commodity comes less from its actual extraction and more from how product is introduced into new markets.

Indeed, that is becoming the next major development in North American natural gas. The expansion in liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports may well hold the key to turning a glut into advancing profit.

The LNG process cools gas into a liquid form, allowing it to be stored and transported via tanker. The liquid is then “regasified” on the other end and injected into existing pipeline systems. This provides for the development of genuine spot markets, since the movement of gas is no longer limited by how far pipelines extend.

The prospect of a long-term natural gas surplus has caused some to ask whether the additional volume coming on-line will simply depress prices. As I have mentioned here several times, this is not a question of conventional, freestanding gas reserves. This is all about unconventional production – primarily shale gas – and where it is likely to be increasing overall availability.

With the gas glut turning into a more permanent energy fixture in North America, the market will progressively become (even more than currently) one in which production will primarily meet regional needs, with contract swaps acting to offset differences between regions.

We will be moving into a very different way of balancing the market. Henceforth (and probably for decades to come) that balance will be affected by the knowledge that there is more supply than required, and it’s easily able to move into the market.

In short, unlike crude oil – where we are beginning to see very early signs pointing to the development of a supply-constricted environment – gas will provide a supply-expansive environment.

Now the recent regulatory changes we discussed last week (“Two Non-Carbon Regulations About to Rock the Coal Sector“) are certain to spur on the accelerating transition from coal to gas and renewables for electricity generation. And that will require additional gas, as will its expanding use in the production of petrochemicals. A cold winter will also drain stockpiles. In storage volume, we are currently well below the levels at this time last year (although those were record levels). Nonetheless, gas out of the ground – but not in the market – still occupies most of the pipeline capacity in the U.S.

And that simply points toward a continuing surplus.

The Advantage of Two North American Plays

Once we consider the impact beyond fulfilling local requirements, some plays will have greater benefits than others. Two are particularly noticeable in North America, and we have discussed both of them in the past.

The first is the rapid development of the Big Horn, Montney, and related basins in western Canada (“Natural Gas Comes Roaring Back in Western Canada“). The second is the Marcellus in Pennsylvania, New York, Ohio, and West Virginia (“Marcellus Shale About to Take Off On One Sweet Ride“).

Both of these are quite likely to provide volume more cheaply than some other basins.

In a surplus condition, cheaper volume will displace more expensive – especially when you consider broader geographical applications (inter-regional trade). Both North American reserves, therefore, should see increasing drilling, even when prices in the market as a whole are going down and drilling is stagnating elsewhere.

And that is the case currently. Despite natural gas contract prices below $4 per 1,000 cubic feet, production and rig usage are increasing in both the Marcellus and western Canada.

But what does this do to the profitability of production companies and pipeline operators? Doesn’t feeding a glut always lead to a downward pressure on prices and a decline in profitability?

Not when a positive spread between production costs and market prices can actually be improved upon. And that’s done simply by moving the gas to locations where the demand is so great, it provides a premium on the return expected.

The development will benefit gas sourced from both conventional and unconventional North American basins.

But first, the current cost-pricing spread. The new shale and tight gas sources in British Columbia and Alberta are providing the likelihood of prices at a $1 to $1.25 discount to Henry Hub (the Louisiana location at which pricing for NYMEX gas contracts is determined). There are some additional costs for transport to distribution points, but recently completed spur lines to the TransCanada Mainline pipeline allow the gas to enter large markets.

In the Marcellus, wells are coming in cheaper than anticipated. The average well spud this year will come in profitable, at less than $3.60 per NYMEX contract, with a rising percentage coming in significantly below that level. Unlike western Canada, the Marcellus has the advantages of much closer proximity to end users and an increasing network of pipelines to serve both throughput and storage.

The concern, however, remains that the enormous amount of volume that both basins could put on-line would still flood the market and depress pricing, regardless of the additional demand for electricity generation or how cold our winters become.

Enter LNG… and two gigantic markets seeking additional gas for which they will pay a premium over North American prices.

Where the Demand Is

Asia needs the increased volume of natural gas to fuel its expansion. Europe needs it to wean itself from reliance on conventionally pipelined (and overpriced) Russian Gazprom volume.

Canada has already decided to move the new gas volume from western Canada to the Kitimat LNG terminal on the Pacific coast of British Columbia for export to Asia. Kitimat is scheduled to come into operation in late 2014. Already, there is a near certainty that its capacity will be doubled.

European requirements combine well with the rapidly expanding volume coming out the Marcellus. And on that count, there is Cove Point, Maryland.

Already in operation, Cove Point is the largest LNG facility on the U.S. east coast. As the need collapses for LNG imports into the U.S. – another result of our ongoing gas surplus – don’t be surprised if this terminal begins reversing operations to export volume. This is tailor-made to provide a major outlet for additional production from the Marcellus.

LNG trade is no flash in the pan. It is becoming the single most important advance in balancing the global gas market. Currently, 86 gasification or regasification terminals exist worldwide; there are another 246 in planning stages or under construction.

Which means, as additional volume comes out of the ground in western Canada, the Marcellus, or other basins in the U.S., it will be shipped to higher-paying markets abroad.

Welcome to North America: the new Saudi Arabia of energy.

Sincerely,

Kent

Please Note: Kent cannot respond to your comments and questions directly. But he can address them in future alerts... so keep an eye on your inbox. If you have a question about your subscription, please email us directly at customerservice@oilandenergyinvestor.com

  1. Pat Tucker
    November 22nd, 2010 at 16:36 | #1

    I am interested in what Dr. Moors thinks of the oil shale potential in Colorado’s Piance basin , also potential of natural gas exploration in that area and what are good companies to invest in.

  2. Edward Dunn
    November 29th, 2010 at 19:49 | #2

    I am interested in shale natural gas deposits in Canada. I understand the fields are huge.

    Thanks!!!

    Ed Dunn

  3. Ralph McDonell
    November 29th, 2010 at 21:49 | #3

    What are the companies to invest in there.

  4. Adrian Sekkel
    November 29th, 2010 at 23:08 | #4

    Dear Dr. Moors:

    What do you think about BEXP & NOG? Do they still have profit potential?

    THank you in advance.
    Adrian Sekkel
    Energy Inner Circle

  5. Glynne Turner
    January 15th, 2011 at 13:53 | #5

    Could Dr. Moors comment on the environmental issues with hydro fracking, and perhaps touch on his opinion of the fracking method which uses petroleum instead of water.
    Thank you.

  6. February 21st, 2011 at 00:44 | #6

    Definitely the LNG cargo is the most important for the economy last years, but also the most dangerous for transportation. The LNG Carriers are among the high quality ships, because of their design and requirements.

  7. Theodore
    December 9th, 2011 at 23:16 | #7

    Dr. Moore,

    Could you Tell me the company I should invest in and the symbols?

  1. No trackbacks yet.