Email

Can the Saudis Deliver the Oil the World Needs?

by | published February 25th, 2011

As decades-long autocratic rule unravels in the Middle East, volatility in the global oil markets continues to point toward one overriding concern… oil.

Almost two-thirds of the world’s known conventional oil supplies are located in the region. How can we maintain an oil flow balance in the face of the rising uncertainty?

Most analysts reduce it to a supply equation. If a certain amount of normal deliveries is suddenly withdrawn from the market – say, for example, the 1.6 million barrels a day produced by Libya – what is the remedy?

We look for other readily available sources to pick up the slack.

That’s why, while Brent prices are still increasing in London – once again approaching $113 a barrel – the rate of that increase is beginning to level off. Meanwhile, West Texas Intermediate crude (the benchmark for settlement on the NYMEX) could be down as much as $1 when the New York market opens this morning.

The Saudis have agreed to replace the volume from Libya lost to the market – actually, lost to Europe, since 80% of Libyan exports move there. Saudi Aramco, the state-owned national oil company, has pledged to move 700,000 barrels into the export flow immediately.

And, with the Saudis, “immediately” does mean just about what the word says.

With roughly 2.5 million barrels per day excess capacity of physically available supply, that can be done in a matter of hours from Saudi fields… translating into a few days or so, when you factor in the transit time required.

Of course, that’s only a momentary respite. We still face the question of sustainability in a longer-term crisis…

And that may be just what we are looking at here.

Click here to find out what disturbs Kent about a Saudi solution…

With Libya Oil Clogged, We Need A Reliable Surplus

As of this morning, about 80% of the Libyan supply is off-line. Forces opposed to strongman Colonel Muammar Gaddafi are now in control of some pivotal export terminals and port facilities.

Libya is descending into a civil war. That is the next stage in this unraveling – a new dimension guaranteed to prolong the crisis period and provide numerous opportunities for the effect to ignite other countries. Already, we are looking with concern on developments in neighboring Algeria.

Saudi oil cannot quell the disturbances in the streets. But at least it can calm down global oil trade.

…Or can it?

Saudi Oil Minister Ali al-Naimi has said repeatedly over the past two years that Saudi Arabia has an upward capacity of 12+ million barrels a day it can move into the market… and it could do so for the next 88 years.

His comment this week – that OPEC would also meet shortages as they appear – is reassuring but not particularly significant. Other OPEC members are regularly selling volumes in excess of their monthly quotas. The apparent surplus available there is on paper only.

When it comes to any reliable surplus of crude, Saudi Arabia is it.

Russia and Canada Aren’t Up to the Task

There are possible non-OPEC sources, too. But they are problematic.

Russia, for example, is now the usual world leader in monthly exports, having displaced the Saudis last year. And the Canadian oil sands provide prospects for additional volume in the longer term.

Yet Russia is facing a rapid maturing of its traditional fields, and significant capex would be required to keep current volume from declining. There may be some marginal help from the Russians… but not to the extent we may need if an entire region becomes unsettled.

As for Canada, the time element gravitates against a solution. The logistics simply are not there to crank up production rapidly; nor, for that matter, is there a transport network to move the oil where it needs to go. The crisis is erupting much faster than an oil sands solution can be put in place.

So it seems we are back to relying on Saudi Arabia.

Is Saudi Oil Enough?

Now, I am overlooking the Armageddon scenario in all of this.

Should the unrest imperil (or even close) transit through the Straits of Hormuz – the primary oil chokepoint in the world – the globe would descend into a mega economic contraction in short order. (On any given day, about 25% of the world’s oil supply passes through the Straits. That includes all of the Saudi supply that cannot be moved by pipeline across the country to Jeddah on the Red Sea.)

But let’s say that does not happen and the increased supply is available from Saudi. Is it enough?

Pumping upwards of 12 million barrels a day from Saudi fields is likely to do some serious damage to the reservoirs. And quickly.

Avoiding for the moment the question raised by the late Matt Simmons and others (including myself) as to whether the Aramco resource and field reserve figures are even accurate, the oil market needs assurance that flows are sustainable to avoid rapidly increasing prices.

Personally, what has disturbed me, on each of my visits to Aramco and its fields, is the use of secondary recovery techniques at the very start of field activity.

Put simply, Aramco is injecting water into wells almost as soon as they are open. That always means at least two things:

  1. Field engineers have immediate pressure problems, and
  2. The water flooding will damage the integrity of the deposit and lower overall production.

Putting maximum stress on the production network will only intensify this problem.

But there are two other even more pressing concerns right now…

Higher Refinery Costs, Soaring Demand

First, the Libyan exports are light sweet (low sulfur) crude. The Saudi (or OPEC, or Russian) is sour crude (with high sulfur content). It is more expensive to refine and process into products like gasoline, diesel, heating oil, and jet fuel.

So even if the volume concerns are met, the Saudi solution will still mean rising prices for the end user.

But the major problem remains the most basic. Assumptions about increasing Aramco flow to meet production declines elsewhere rally means that we have only about three million extra barrels a day available.

Libya, in full-blow conflict, takes up more than half that amount.

And that excess capacity figure was calculated last year, based on global demand rates. Those rates are now increasing faster than expected.

OPEC itself quietly raised its worldwide demand estimate three times in 2010 – the first time that has ever happened.

By 2012, soaring international requirements for oil may effectively reduce the Saudi surplus to about two million barrels a day. That reduces the effective Saudi surplus after Libyan replacement to about 400,000 barrels a day.

Period.

Oil traders make pricing determinations based on forward-looking perceptions, rather than current availability. If demand continues to rise (and it almost certainly will) and Libyan supply remains interrupted, we would need a single new hotspot to emerge in an already troubled Middle East to exhaust the Saudi solution.

Saudi Arabia just may not have enough oil to go around.

Sincerely,
Kent

Please Note: Kent cannot respond to your comments and questions directly. But he can address them in future alerts... so keep an eye on your inbox. If you have a question about your subscription, please email us directly at customerservice@oilandenergyinvestor.com

  1. Frank McCraw
    February 25th, 2011 at 14:44 | #1

    “(On any given day, about 25% of the world’s oil supply passes through the Straits. That includes all of the Saudi supply that cannot be moved by pipeline across the country to Jeddah on the Red Sea.)”

    What does this statement mean? Surely you don’t mean the first clause “on any given day” in this sentence.

  2. joe crawford
    February 25th, 2011 at 14:59 | #2

    Will the 1-150 barrel per day producers get back in the picture if the Mid East does blow? What is the upside for investors (if there is one) from this play?

  3. Jan van de Linde
    February 25th, 2011 at 15:08 | #3

    In many situations the use of oil can be replaced by natural gas. And of that there is enough. But in other situations (planes, ships) that will not work. But there seems to be an efficient way to make a liquid energy source from natural gas(other than png).
    Any investment advantages there?

  4. Alistair Sinclair
    February 25th, 2011 at 15:09 | #4

    @Frank McCraw — means what is says Frank, that while the amount through Hormuz varies, it’s about 1/4 of the worlds oil supply. There is NOTHING wrong with the statement. I suggest you add the following parenthetical to your ‘handle,’ i.e., “Frank (Anal) McCraw” so that in the future we are forewarned. Moors writes a great piece that is enlightening and informative … and this is what you whine about, you are amazing (in your own mind).

  5. kirk
    February 25th, 2011 at 15:32 | #5

    Kent,
    I believe Mexico is the 8th largest producer of oil and their output equals Libya and Iraq combined. What is the quality of Mexico’s oil and who do they supply? Thanks

  6. Tony Waters
    February 25th, 2011 at 15:32 | #6

    Frank, this is correct. It is understood within the context of this particular article that the reader knows that it means 25% of the world’s (daily) oil supply. Best Regards, CanadaNorth

  7. Joachim Troilius
    February 25th, 2011 at 17:11 | #7

    Dear Kent,

    What about Norwegian oil production? They are a non-OPEC oil and gas producer of a sizable amount.

    Best,

    Joachim Troilius
    Sweden

  8. Beth
    February 25th, 2011 at 20:21 | #8

    I have heard that there is plenty of oil already in the US which is not being used and being saved for a rainy day when the rest of the world develop a shortage. Until then the US avails itself of the rest of the world’s oil supply.

  9. February 26th, 2011 at 11:01 | #9

    What opportunities (if any) are available for small retail investors to take advantage of the spread between Brent and West Texas crude oil prices other than complex call/out hedging trades? Thanks

  10. James LaBorde
    February 27th, 2011 at 13:33 | #10

    Dr. Moors,

    In reference to your recent article on how much excess oil production capacity Saudi Arabia has, I agree with you overall conclusions, but I do have have a few disagreements regarding your comments about the early implementation of water flooding:

    1) You said “the Field Engineers have immediate pressure problems”. I’m not sure exactly what you mean by this, but certain the “field engineers” do not have problems. Perhaps the reservoirs do.

    2) You said “water flooding will damge the integrity of the deposit and lower overall production”. If the water injection source used is compatible with the reservoir, and the water injection sites are properly designed to prevent early water break-through (both aerially and vertically), the early implementation of waterflooding can only result in improved recovery due to better oil mobility and the reduction of the detrimental effects associated with increased gas saturation which results if waterflooding is initiated latter.

    Regards,

    Jim LaBorde

  11. Ed Gould
    February 28th, 2011 at 06:38 | #11

    Kent,
    Can you discuss the Paris Basin finds, their likely effect on French and European demand and the potential extent of its significance on overall world demand over time?

  12. buy silver
    April 2nd, 2011 at 10:22 | #12

    Then this morning there are from Saudi insiders that Saudi Arabia has actually already raised production at or above 9mbd ..Saudi Arabia has increased its oil production to more than 9 million barrels per day bpd to compensate for disruption to Libyan output an industry source familiar with the kingdoms production told Reuters on Friday… We have started producing over 9 million barrels per day bpd . .said…….Alex That was the subject of a massive debate on The Oil Drum and Econbrowser at the time. My opinion is the most likely cause is declines in some of the older fields together with long lack of investment in newer fields meant that they were unable to sustain 9.5 at that time.

  1. No trackbacks yet.