Email

New Algae Research May Have Uncovered an “Energy Forest” Under the Sea

by | published November 20th, 2014

I’ve never subscribed to the idea that we need a silver bullet to replace crude oil.

I’ve always believed the better solution would be to develop a working balance among sustainable and exchangeable energy sources.

Today, we have contributions from renewables like solar, wind, geothermal, biofuels, and even wave and kinetic power, to complement the energy we create from crude oil, natural gas, nuclear, and coal.

And there are “new” forms of energy being touted every day. Some of these new directions represent thinking that is quite “outside the box.”

In fact, several years ago I was actively involved in evaluating some of these new energy technologies. It involved field work, visiting laboratories, testing centers, and production facilities in a number of locations.

I found the novel ways of looking at problems and coming up with new solutions absolutely fascinating.

Yet, of all the “game changers” I was asked to review, one source was by far the most common. The phone calls became so frequent I referred to them under one phrase.

I would simply call them my “algae of the week.” And none of them ever amounted to much.

But an entirely new angle being developed in Sweden might just change all of that…

The Roadblock for Most Algae-Based Biofuels

Of course, the main problem with the initial categories of biofuels was that they involved growing matter that was also a food stock or fodder (itself resulting in the same thing). The corn-based ethanol popular in the U.S. is a variety of fuel that has this problem as well.

And then there was the additional shortcoming on the energy side of the equation. Bio-based fuels delivered much less bang for the buck when it came to replacing oil products like gasoline or diesel.

So eventually the attention shifted to biofuels that could be created using plants that aren’t food crops or take up land that could otherwise be used for farming.

It was in this mixture of non-food, wasteland, and organic residue that algae found its opening.

Now, the scientific approach to algae has been there for some time. There is no question that algae generates energy, significant amounts when compared to the actual mass of the organic base. And there has always been something rather attractive about heating homes or distilling fuel from pond scum.

But the difficulties of making this work economically were something else entirely. Most experiments with algae, even those that could be considered on an industrial scale, ended up with an unacceptable energy returned on energy invested, or EROEI.

Now it’s giving away my age to mention that when we first started using this as a barometer of energy efficiency it was referred to as the energy profit ratio, or EPR.

But whether you call it EROEI or EPR, its importance doesn’t change. The ratio measures how much energy has to be used to produce a given amount of energy on the user’s end. If the ratio is less than 1, more energy is invested than returned.

That could still make for a neat party trick, but would be useless in any situation other than a war or a national emergency.

Ultimately, that is the roadblock that most algae experiments hit – it simply took too much energy to produce algae-based energy. This resulted either from the infrastructure and processing required to produce the algae in large enough quantities, or the even more vexing problem of “breaking” the algae membranes  to release the energy being generated.

However, a new possibility has emerged that may actually hold some real promise.

An “Energy Forest” Under the Sea

As the Climate News Network reported late last month, this algae-based model involves using seaweed.

Seaweed has been used for fertilizer, and even is part of ingested diets in various parts of the world. But now there’s an energy connection emerging from an approach being pioneered in Sweden with a particular species.

It’s called “sugar kelp” (Laminaria saccharina) and it grows prolifically along the Baltic Sea coastlines of Sweden, Norway, and Denmark. It contains over three times the energy of sugar beets, and has promising prospects for both energy and food.

The point guy here is Frederik Gröndahl, a Swedish KTH Royal Institute of Technology researcher and head of the Seafarm project. The overarching goal of this project is to develop a sustainable system for the use of seaweeds as a renewable resource in a future, bio-based Swedish society.

According to Gröndahl, the coasts of Sweden are perfect for the cultivation of large algae (macroalgae), since there are plentiful archipelagos and well-sheltered areas. The only thing required is sunlight, which allows the algae to grow by a couple of meters per season. The first algae farm is already up and running, near the Swedish town of Strömstad, in the waters that separate the country from Denmark.

And the initial results are intriguing.

“The fact is that algae can absorb nitrogen from the water as effectively as a wastewater treatment plant,” Gröndahl says.

The seaweed is being scooped up in order to be converted into biogas. The city of Trelleborg estimates that its beaches contain an excess of algae that is equivalent to the energy from 2.8 million liters of diesel fuel.

“It will be an energy forest at sea,” according to Gröndahl. “My vision is that in 15 years’ time, we will have many large algae cultivations along our coasts; and Seafarm will have contributed to the creation of a new industry from which people can make a living.”

Of course, a great deal needs to be done before an actual biofuel revolution is underway in the seaweed off the Baltic coast.

Nonetheless, it has already spawned its first media tag…

“Seaweed offers kelping hand for biofuels,” a local Swedish newspaper headline read last week.

Please Note: Kent cannot respond to your comments and questions directly. But he can address them in future alerts... so keep an eye on your inbox. If you have a question about your subscription, please email us directly at customerservice@oilandenergyinvestor.com

  1. November 20th, 2014 at 16:47 | #1

    About the “Energy Forest” Under the Sea:

    Reminds me of the osmosis power project in nearby Norway “Osmosis — An Alternative Energy Idea Gone Bust” at Canada Free Press, article/66815 (2014).

    You may also like to see may take on the algae idea “The scam of Scum” at Canada Free Press, article 45028 (2012).

    Regards,
    K.K.

  2. Sunny
    November 20th, 2014 at 16:49 | #2

    We are definitely living in an ever-expanding exploratory era of energy r & d. Seaweed/algae as both food and energy? fascinating…

  3. November 20th, 2014 at 19:03 | #3

    Of course, seaweed isn’t usually classified as algae…

    Sugars derived from seaweed could be used in the next generation of energy dense batteries, as propounded by Dr. E U “Percival” Zhang at Virginia Tech.

    That would be a great advance over the Lion battery that Tesla is spending $6 Billion to build…too bad, we could use that kind of money to develop better technologies, like bio based bacterial hydrogen, and sugar batteries…

  4. November 23rd, 2014 at 18:03 | #4

    Algae is an order of magnitude ahead of sugar cane for producing bio-diesel. 10,000 gallons per acre VS 465 gallons per acre. As for sea weed, it costs too much to get it. And corn is an obscenity against science, energy, economy and environment.

    Especially the savage attack of corn on the Oglala aquifer. There is NO justification for ethanol!
    Natures Fluid has the ability to accelerate the growth of algae by a factor of at least 25 percent.
    R Matthews, PE

  5. November 28th, 2014 at 20:05 | #5

    Why Lower Oil Prices Won’t Kill the Renewable Energy Boom
    These directions are very true..but need to address 3 points..
    1.The advent of Sun-gas, syn-gas, ng to gasoline all show that enormous efforts in Canada, US, and Germany are moving toward the NG and Hydrogen including FCEV fast evolution
    2. Russia’s gameplaying with NG is as foolish as China’s games with Japan and the South China sea…China still emphsizing more instead of different. It s clear we are seeing the end of Middle East dominance and the emergence of the Pacific Century especially with whats going on with Coober Pedy, AU. The US must parnership with China to the direction of a Hydrogen future and higher density batteries, together
    the answer and soon. People forget that Benz invented the ICE.
    3. We are tired of paying for war and 2x the price we pay for gasoline. The cost of Iraq alone should make us realize we should have invested more in hydrogen and batteries.Exxon/Mobile is out and the people of the US China and the Pacific are in. We are tired of beheading by those who don’t see that the M.E.is “last century”
    The O&G business is socialistic and oligarchy dominated, calculate the numbers and face the fact that we are driven by the 99/1 % imblance
    and in the nxt 12 years we’re adding 1 Billion to the planet. the century of exploitation is over and the free market should return the
    direction to WE (Water and energy) not ME (Midde East). Call for the drection of Hydrogen/NG/and battery density and invigorate the economy and the envirnment…all it takes is uncorrupted leadership , but the
    status quo prefers death and lying to the people instead of pure opportunity. Charlie Pedersen hbtrex@aol.com

  6. Carl Russo
    December 2nd, 2014 at 00:16 | #6

    I began hearing about alternative fuels back in the ’60’s. We should also remember that alcohol as a transport fuel was well explored in the ’30’s by Ethyl Corp. the maker of lead fuel additives, amongst others.

    When in high school, I was offered a summer job in Rockland Maine to work on a kelp farm. Kelp was just beginning to be used as a food additive in those days, and has since found additional uses in organic fertilizers (just like in Colonial Times) and a myriad of other products. Sounds like sugar kelp could be a big winner. In retrospect, I probably should have taken the kelp farm job.

  7. Judith Begley Merchant
    December 14th, 2014 at 10:13 | #7

    Dr. Moors,

    I’ve worked in the oil industry my whole career and I’m currently supporting one of the conditionally permitted export facilities under construction in the U.S. I share your belief that we should employ the full spectrum of energy resources and technologies on the U.S. using responsible and sound environmental controls. Even as we endure the fluctuations in oil prices I see the path forward and I’m excited about the future, finally. I see the U.S. path for energy independence and the link being made by the prospects for harvesting algae. We will spend many more years with the elixir of oil, and I’m happy about that, but it’s finally clear to me how we will transition to a more clean and renewable energy resource. Its an exciting time to be alive! How do we help the world see what is unfolding? How may I assist you?

  8. c. waxman
    December 14th, 2014 at 14:29 | #8

    All this information is immensely important, and I would like to have names of investment opportunities to take advantage of what you describe.

  1. No trackbacks yet.