Viewing articles tagged ‘growth rate’

Why A 1,315% Growth Rate Tells Us Little…

by Dr. Kent Moors | published November 30th, 2011

A Note from Kent: My next Oil & Energy Investor will be coming to you Friday morning, while I am in transit to Russia.

But today I wanted to let you know – personally – about some fantastic news.

I started out a couple years back wanting to provide first-hand information and analysis for the “regular guy” looking to make a buck in the energy markets. Yet lately, they are moving faster than ever – faster than me, certainly. So many new developments crop up, every day, that I have a hard time handling it all in just two installments.

I need someone qualifiedto help me cover all of this opportunity.

So I am delighted to introduce you to James Baldwin.

A former Wall Street and energy consultant, James has crafted unique leadership roles in financial publishing, competitive and market intelligence, corporate advocacy, and financial planning. He’s also a bona fide journalist. He’s covered the financial crisis, corporate governance, executive leadership, and the oil and energy markets. These days, he’s concentrating on energy policy. And that’s what really made him stand out as the man for the job.

(The opportunity came along to lock him in just before Thanksgiving,and I jumped all over it.)

Each Wednesday – starting today – James will be writing an additional, third column for OEI readers.

I hope you find his perspectives interesting and profitable. Because remember: Energy remains the single most lucrative segment in today’s investment markets.

Enjoy…

Why A 1,315% Growth Rate Tells Us Little…

by James Baldwin

Dear Oil & Energy Investor,

While Kent prepares for his trip to Moscow this weekend, I’m settling into my new office for a little light reading…

On tap: catching up on a stack of earnings reports and press releases that built up over the Thanksgiving break. (Don’t worry; I actually enjoy this sort of thing.)

My attention turns to a familiar topic: Midstream oil and gas plays poised for growth in this new age of domestic energy production.

But in the last two weeks, there has been a lot of talk about the huge boost in year-over-year earnings-per-share (EPS) from these players, particularly in the Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs).

This was highlighted by the jubilance of investors that Genesis Energy’s (NYSE: GEL) forecasted EPS-growth rate soared to 1,315% just last week.

Now, the average investor might see that percentage and think it warrants a boost to the long-term share price.

But we have to be careful in these waters.

It’s critical that you understand something about EPS and MLPs – something that some analysts are just now beginning to recognize…

EPS Doesn’t Tell the Full Story

It’s quite simple to understand why.

No doubt about it: Midstream operations remain hot right now.

Remember, the midstream players connect those producing fields (upstream) with refineries, distribution, and retail sales (downstream). With oil and gas flowing, the market needs operations in transportation, processing, storage, and marketing. There has also been a flurry of M&A activity in the sector.

And they’re just getting started.

The intense boost to recoverable North American shale oil and gas and our growing energy needs will push domestic midstream investments to more than $8 billion per year through 2035, according to the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America.

So, with job growth and production booming in shale fields around the United States, there’s good money to be made in this portion of the value chain.

And a 1,315% forecasted year-over-year growth rate is an astonishing figure… on the surface.

But the reality is, we have to be very careful when we evaluate stocks based on metrics like EPS (MLPs actually use a similar figure, but they call it earnings-per-unit).

This metric doesn’t tell the full story of the partnership’s potential performance.

And if you look at the chart below, you’ll see immediately why Genesis’ forecasted growth rate is misleading…

GenesisEnergy

The grey lines represent the consensus EPS forecasts for each quarter through September 2012. The yellow represents GEL’s actual earnings.

The 1,315% is a calculation of the December 2011 forecast divided by the company’s actual EPS in December 2010.

As you can see, in the fourth quarter of 2010, GEL reported earnings of two cents per share.

So why is growth of 1,315%, moving forward, misleading?

Because the 2010 figure includes a great deal of management compensation expenses tied to its general partner from previous years. At that time, Genesis also acquired large stakes in Marathon Oil’s interests in several pipeline systems. This included a 28% interest in Poseidon Oil Pipeline, a 29% interest in Odyssey Pipeline, and a 23% interest in the Eugene Island Pipeline System.

In other words, two cents in 2010, compared to a relatively mild 26-cent forecast for December 2011, makes it appear that the company popped… even though the stock has remained in a similar price range year-over-year.

This doesn’t mean the company is a good or bad investment; it just paints an incomplete picture.

Now, this EPS “problem” should only be a concern to an investor if they are trying to gain both a yield and price appreciation. Short a complete collapse, the yield will still be strong even if the stock price is experiencing temporary negative pressures.

So if earnings-per-unit isn’t complete, what is the best way for us to measure our MLPs growth potential?

Click here to continue reading…