Why Logistics is the (Real) Energy Opportunity after Sandy

Why Logistics is the (Real) Energy Opportunity after Sandy

by | published November 2nd, 2012

Since the storm this week, I’ve seen a recurring, disturbing bit of advice surface on those cable news investment shows.

The pundits are hard at work prognosticating on what is likely to spike in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy. They are peddling a belief that this natural disaster will produce shortages – and that those shortages can be exploited for a short-term windfall.
But this is a mistake.

In fact, this is one of the most persistent errors made by investors during such a period.

In the medium-term, however, there is sometimes a consequence of a hurricane or other disaster that translates into genuine opportunity. There is certainly one this time. And I’ll talk about how to position for that in a moment.

First, we need to explore what you as an investor should not do right now…

The Myth of Exploiting Shortages

Given all the images on the news, you might think an investor could profit from buying near-month futures – or exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that deal with them – that track gasoline, oil, or even timber in the wake of the hurricane.

I hope you haven’t done that.

If you did, you would already be in the red.

Authorities opened the Port of New York and New Jersey this morning to allow oil products into the besieged region. Gasoline lines swelled, augmented by continued power shortages affecting the ability to pump. Well, wouldn’t that be a good reason to expect rising prices? After all, it would seem to be a textbook case of supply and demand pushing prices up.

The price of gasoline futures contracts did spike in the days before the storm hit, with NYMEX futures contracts for RBOB (Reformulated Blendstock for Oxygenate Blending, the gasoline futures contract traded in New York) jumping almost 20 cents a gallon, at one point.

But they did not stay there.

The futures stabilized, and the ETFs following them actually started to retreat. More of that downward movement is expected today, since – in the current environment – nobody really wants to be left holding inventory they cannot move over the weekend. That is about as unprofitable game of “market musical chairs” as there is.

Crude oil and timber futures followed suit.

Yes, gasoline, oil, and timber are needed, and yes, the supply is in question. Unfortunately, that is not where the problem lies – at least not the problem you can exploit for profits.

This is not about lack of supply. It is about a lack of logistics.

The Almost Incalculable Value of Logistics

Oil prices have leveled for one simple reason.

There is no need to extract additional volume if there is no place to store it, or no clear access to transport it to refiners. The storm’s aftermath not only impacts the retail or end-user’s side, but it also pressures the entire upstream-downstream process.

Timber futures tanked. That was in direct contrast to comments widely circulating, that the need to repair extensive damage would produce a run on available lumber.

Of course, that will be true in the long run. While there will likely be a pop at some point, now – in the shadow of the storm – is not it.

The same inventory, storage, and transmission problems attending oil and gasoline are also evident here. The value of inventory is significantly discounted if you cannot get it to where it is needed.

That’s the importance of logistics.

OK, so how should an investor play this? If the problem is logistics, how do you position yourself to benefit?

Two Ways to Profit

First, this is the midstream consideration. As I’ve written before, the midstream is the component that provides the services connecting the fields (upstream) with refineries and processors, wholesale distribution, and direct market sales (downstream).

Within the midstream segment resides components in gathering, transport (pipelines, both feeder and trunk), storage, terminals, initial processing, separation, and fractionating (all designed to separate the main volume flow from value-added products, on the one hand, or waste, tailings, and the like, on the other).

There is opportunity in this sector. I continue to advise my Energy Inner Circle subscribers on some of the best moves. A rising number of these are equity issues from Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs), which we like so much. Many of them combine a good return with well above average dividends – I call that the “sweet spot” of energy investing.

One of my favorite shares has been the JPMorgan Alerian MLP Index ETN (NYSEArca: AMJ). This is an exchange-traded note that allows average investors to partake in the profits from a number of pipeline systems controlled by MLPs.

We have also moved on other specific midstream servicers, and they are all in the black, despite recent gyrations and instability.

Second, there’s the developing – potentially very profitable – logistics play.

There are about 600 stocks on my “trigger list” and “tasking list.” These are energy sector companies I follow and analyze but are not yet part of investment recommendations.

Of the two lists, my “trigger” stocks are those closest to action. Each stock there has already hit several indicators that make it a prime candidate for recommendation. And it is here that the next move in midstreams is underway.
To date, it has been physical facilities that have been the primary midstream focus – pipelines, storage, processing locations. However, Sandy is the latest lesson about the need for something else – logistics in its purest sense.

Two companies on the trigger list provide those logistics. These companies offer the planning, equipment, and approaches to combat bottlenecks, the single biggest problem in moving product from field to refinery to market.

[Editor’s Note: Now is an incredibly compelling time to get access to Kent’s trigger list. Here’s why. You’ll also find out which two companies he’s recommending right now.]

The packaging of services to increase efficiency in the transport, storage, and distribution of oil, gas, and even electricity (of the three the one with the most pronounced storage problem) was once put on the back burner, with ideas about smart grids and just-in-time management. It is now becoming a major need. Indeed, I believe it to be the next major advance in midstreams.

Both of these companies have been rising in value over the past several months, by 7% and 11% in the last week alone, as the New York area wrestled with Sandy.

When it’s time to move on these two stocks, my subscribers will be the first to know.

This is likely to be a major profit center moving forward. The need certainly will not be going away.

In fact, word now is that a Nor’easter is barreling down the Eastern seaboard. It may reach some of the same areas hit by Sandy just in time for Election Day.

Please Note: Kent cannot respond to your comments and questions directly. But he can address them in future alerts... so keep an eye on your inbox. If you have a question about your subscription, please email us directly at customerservice@oilandenergyinvestor.com

  1. Bob
    November 2nd, 2012 at 16:57 | #1

    Hi Kent:

    I wonder if you have any reaction to the huge financial deal in Russia with BP-TNK sold to Rosneft.

  2. November 2nd, 2012 at 17:29 | #2

    are there disadvantages to owning MLPs in a roth ira

  3. Allan Robinson
    November 3rd, 2012 at 18:07 | #3

    This is precisely the problem with our world today, lead by the Banksters in the USA: looking to see how to profit from someone else’s disasters, instaed of looking to see how to be constructive and contributive to social development, helping one’s unfortunate fellow citizens along the way.
    That is savage capitalism at its worst, lead by the crooked bankers, supported by equally crooked politicans, all eating from the same feeding trough.
    And no one doing anything about this shameless and shameful situation.
    That’s why thw Western world in is the mess it is, and things can only get worse.

  4. November 6th, 2012 at 16:23 | #4


    As usural you come accross as an original thinker, which I do not deny.

    But part of that original thinking is preperation for it and a trail
    of relevant experience. I congratulate you for having it.

    I think I am too old to get involved in the complexities of Master
    Limited Partnerships or options. From your book I deduce that Vega
    is the second derivative from calculus of the price. Yes thats a
    tough nut to crack, but I suspect my method of knowing when to buy and
    sell,which is quite complex, could crack it.

    William B. Smith

  5. Junior Bodine
    November 8th, 2012 at 21:35 | #5

    @alton deville

    >>are there disadvantages to owning MLPs in a roth ira?

    Despite the widespread advice to avoid MLPs in IRAs, I have found a Roth IRA is the BEST place for MLPs. The naysayers harp on the $1,000 limit for UBTI (Unrelated Business Income) causing IRAs to be subject to tax from MLPs. But one would have to hold MILLIONS of dollars worth of MLPs in an IRA to approach $1,000 UBTI. Most of the distributions are return of capital, depreciation allowances, etc. OTOH, the nature of these distributions are a nightmare of tax-reporting in a taxable account (in exchange for the tax deferral advantages), but all that complexity goes away in an IRA.

    Over the last few years, I have rotated out of all MLPs in taxable accounts and have bought all of my MLP positions in Roth IRAs. No need to ever deal with partnership K-1 tax filings again. Life is so much simpler, and the 7% – 18% distributions are now truly tax-FREE as long as they stay in the Roth until I am age 59 1/2.

  6. Sumflow
    December 7th, 2012 at 01:04 | #6

    alton deville :
    are there disadvantages to owning MLPs in a roth ira

    When you own publicly traded partnerships in a Roth, the high yielding returns will accumulate in your account tax free. A Roth is a good way to hold Mlps.

  7. Sumflow
    December 7th, 2012 at 01:07 | #7

    Junior Bodine :
    @alton deville
    >>are there disadvantages to owning MLPs in a roth ira?
    Life is so much simpler, .. distributions are now truly tax-FREE as long as they stay in the Roth until I am age 59 1/2.

    Or until you die.

  1. No trackbacks yet.