This Spells Big Trouble for the Russians

This Spells Big Trouble for the Russians

by | published December 3rd, 2013

It seems the shoe is on the other foot for a change, making for some interesting developments here in Moscow.

It’s the sixth time in as many years that I’ve been invited to give a briefing during the annual policy meetings held by the Ministry of Energy. This trip, however, is not like all the rest.

Instead of the usual certainty, there is a noticeable indecision in where Moscow plans to move next.  

As an OEI reader, you probably know the reason.  It’s unconventional crude and it’s completely changing the global landscape.

And while North America has been the focus of this new source of crude, it’s the global unconventional reserves that have started to change the dynamics in the cross-border energy balance.

Here’s why that has the Kremlin worried…

Believe Me, This is No “Flash-in-the-Pan”

You see, traditionally has been able to obtain a certain amount of leverage from being the largest non-OPEC producer of conventional oil. The authorities simply parlay OPEC supply quotas to improve their export pricing and undercut OPEC members in selected global regions when Russian companies can improve market penetration by providing additional volume.

These days, however, that leverage is in jeopardy and the culprit is the same factor that is moving the U.S. market to the top of the production list. Unconventional oil is growing so fast, American oil production this year will come in at a higher level than at any point since the late 1970s, with the prospects of becoming the world’s largest supplier a possible near-term reality.

What’s more, Russia’s earlier campaign against shale gas (claiming it is a “flash in the pan,” unsustainable, causes earthquakes, etc.) has fallen flat as more and more unconventional gas is found worldwide and interest grows for its development.

, Russia’s biggest enterprise and the largest gas company on earth simply miscalculated on that one. While has begun serious development of coal bed methane (another major source of unconventional gas), it has steadfastly maintained shale gas will come and go quickly, being mainly confined to the U.S. and Canada.

Unfortunately, for Russian intentions, nobody else in the world is buying that argument -especially in light of the latest reserve figures.

The first global estimate of recoverable shale gas was issued in 2011.  But this June, the first revision of those figures was released, a study that also included the initial projections of tight oil.

Both of these projections were much higher than anybody hadanticipated.

That is bad news for the Kremlin because Russian policy has always emphasized long-term, take or pay, pipeline contracts with the cost of gas based on a basket of crude oil and oil product pricing.

Yet with the advent of new unconventional availability, combined with an acceleration of liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports, the Russian preeminence in the availability of hydrocarbons is now under threat.

Here’s why…

Both shale gas and LNG are providing new opportunities for local spot gas markets to form in places that used to be dependent upon Russian pipelined product. As these localize markets begin to have assured volume, the spot nature of the transactions are undercutting the price needed by Russian companies to make a profit on their exports.

The Problem with “Take or Pay” Contracts

It happens this way…

The contracts signed with Gazprom or are usually for twenty years. However, the take or pay provision requires the end user to agree to import a certain amount or pay as if they had (this is usually 75% or more of the monthly contracted amount).

On top of that, with gas prices pegged to that of oil, the rise in Brent crude prices in London (now in excess of $110 a barrel) has caused the price for to climb. Ordinarily, that would be gravy for Moscow except for one noticeable change in the situation.

Thanks to the emergence of shale gas and LNG, they are no longer the only game in town.

In the immediate term, the shale gas extracted elsewhere will impact market prices in Europe and Asia as LNG exports begin to ramp up. In a few years, however, domestically produced unconventional volume will also come on the scene.

The combination of imported LNG and rising local shale production will make matters very difficult for Gazprom…and the central government back in Moscow that relies on the export revenues.

As a result, Gazprom is belatedly moving as quickly as it can into LNG exports as a way of offsetting this challenge. But the truth is they are well behind the curve.

Even More Problems for Moscow

The same change is now appearing on the oil side.

Once again, it is the presence of unconventional production that is creating the angst. This matter has been the agenda for our conversations for months. But more recently, a new concern also materialized.

The possible agreement to relax sanctions against Iranian oil exports is now acting like a double whammy on what are becoming the most interesting of these annual policy meetings in years.

As I noted last week, it remains too early to tell whether an accord is actually coming, since all of the main hurdles on the Iranian nuclear agenda have yet to be confronted.

But Russia is already seeing the writing on the wall. They did sign off on the accord. They cannot assume it will fail or that the other factors laying siege to their traditional control over export venues will simply evaporate.

That has led to a quite unfamiliar posture in Moscow – indecision. It has also led to another unanticipated wrinkle.

My major presentation is scheduled for later today (I am writing this early in the morning Moscow time – nine hours ahead of East Coast U.S.). And last evening, they asked if I could change the focus of my comments to include these all of these new elements.

I have willingly agreed. As regular readers of OEI are well aware, I have been addressing the changing dimensions of the new energy balance for some time now. So I do have an approach that I’m ready to suggest to them.

The good news is that it’s one we can make some money on. So stay tuned.

Please Note: Kent cannot respond to your comments and questions directly. But he can address them in future alerts... so keep an eye on your inbox. If you have a question about your subscription, please email us directly at

  1. EndPutin
    December 3rd, 2013 at 18:25 | #1

    This is great news to hear that Putin is being squeezed by cheaper gas and oil. He has been bullying his neighbors and stealing from his own people for years. I guess he won’t be able to stash as much money is his Lichtenstein account as he had hoped.

  2. Greg Hermann, P.E.
    December 3rd, 2013 at 18:39 | #2

    All of the content in this article leads me to wonder how much of the greenies’ ‘anti-fracking’ campaign in the USA and Canada, not to mention Europe, is funded on a covert basis by the Russkies ??!!??

  3. Will S
    December 4th, 2013 at 01:10 | #3

    Anti-fracking rhetoric? Russian support? Do you not watch RT? ;-))

    Watch as a woman holds a match to her water faucet/cold water tap and lights the gas that escapes as it leaks from her water supply…. No really?

    And Iran can sell her oil (as long as it’s for dollars and not Gold) and the yanks will be nice to her… Of course the Chinese enforcing a no fly zone over the South China Sea (unlessyou inform us first) and the Russians claiming the mineral wealth under the Lomonosov Ridge has nothing to do with geo-politics does it? (Or the events in Syria over a gas pipeline)

    WW3? Circa 2020-2035? Not totally outside the bounds of possibility I.M.H.O. But this time the white hats lose… Again

  4. Ed Nichol
    December 6th, 2013 at 08:48 | #4

    @Bruce Allen
    And the possibility that the tar sands would get a proper price? That won’t happen. The Canadians need a large cross Canada pipe to the East, then prices all over North America would be sensible.

  5. roger eichman
    December 17th, 2013 at 17:56 | #5

    What about GTL and it’s effect on LNG/oil pricing? Why is it not being used more?

  1. No trackbacks yet.