The Two Latest Strikes in the New Cold War

The Two Latest Strikes in the New Cold War

by | published June 16th, 2015

Greetings from Paris! My wife Marina and I had hoped that we could enjoy some “downtime” in the City of Light between three days of intensive conference sessions in London and the meeting on longer-term initiatives I have here later this week.

It’s not quite working out that way.

Here in Europe, I find myself more attuned to the impact of events much geographically closer than I did sitting back home on the East Coast.

I feel like I’m back in the days of the Cold War. But even then, despite the pressure, there was a sense that the other side understood the rules surrounding a deadly game of chicken.

Today, the situation is actually less stable. Both sides think they can actually win a standoff in what is quickly shaping up as a deadly version of the board game Risk.

This morning, there are two pressing matters. Both are geopolitical, certain to contribute additional uncertainty to the global energy sector, and unfolding only a few hours’ flight from where I am writing this.

Here’s my take on the two European crises about to boil over…

An Old Flashpoint Reignites

As we await the beginning of the major annual Russian economic meeting and showcase in Saint Petersburg, new moves from Moscow are almost certain. They will up the ante in an already spiraling situation.

A disturbing theme has emerged over the past several days on Russian TV “discussion” shows. These are meant for domestic consumption inside the country but can be readily viewed here in Paris.

Calling them “discussion” shows is giving them some benefit of the doubt. These are largely orchestrated renditions of a dominant opinion. There is, of course, some nod to other views, but the resolution is never in doubt. There is a pre-ordained “line,” and it will be the dominant attitude shared by the audience and the participants.

Unlike the U.S. – where a Democrat in the White House is usually criticized on one cable news network while a Republican has the same fate on another – there is nothing on Russian TV opposed to the official line. Putin receives the lion’s share of media attention while opposition movements are treated like the plague.

As a result, the Kremlin will sometimes employ the broadcast discussions to initiate public support for impending actions. And that is now underway.

From almost nowhere, attention is now drawn to a particular section of Moldova. It also happens to be a matter I addressed some 20 years ago while pursuing another line of work. Then, I considered it a potential flashpoint of some consequence as the post-Soviet period began.

It is now quickly returning to that status again.

Troubles in Moldova

Transdniester is a breakaway region in eastern/northeastern Moldova. Located east of the Dniester River, it borders Ukraine to the east and the remainder of the former Soviet republic of Moldova to the west.

The majority of Moldovans are of Romanian ethnicity, with Romania – a member of both the European Union and NATO – further to the west.

Transdniester, however, is decidedly Russian in ethnicity. When the Soviet Union disintegrated in 1991 and Moldova became independent, this region immediately moved to become independent from the Moldovan government in the capital of Chisinau. It was then that Moscow moved to stabilize the situation.

Russian troops have been stationed as “peacekeepers” in Transdniester ever since. The local residents overwhelmingly want to be part of Russia, despite the two countries having no common border (Ukraine lies between).

These days, Moscow is complaining that Ukraine is not allowing it to resupply and cycle new troops into Transdniester, and the Kremlin is drumming up Russian popular support for another possible move to “rescue” Russians as they did with considerable domestic support in annexing Crimea at the beginning of the Ukrainian conflict.

How Russia Could Move on Transdniester

Here’s where my earlier work may come in. Eighteen years ago I authored a government report describing how Moscow would move on this recalcitrant region in Moldova. It does not require a march across the body of Ukraine.

Rather, as I described then, it requires two separate stages. First, a return of the Russian ethnic population of Crimea to Russia. That has been accomplished. Second, the annexation of a thin strip of land in southern Ukraine connecting Crimea to Transdniester.

Watch the current ongoing battle in eastern Ukraine. As the local rebels supported by Moscow move in a southwestern direction, they make the “southern corridor” strategy that much easier.

Why would the Kremlin even care?

First, it encloses Ukraine and makes Kiev’s policy options even more limited. Second, it now brings the Russian army squarely on NATO’s border, putting the rest of Moldova literally between a rock and a hard place.

This is a deadly game of chess in which the object is to apply renewed pressure to bear on an increasingly belligerent border.

Moscow Steps In on Greece

But that is only the first of two primary moves Moscow has in mind. The second involves Greece.

The leftist government in Athens and an increasingly frustrated euro zone seem cascading to an acrimonious divorce. The so-called “Grexit” – the Greek departure from the euro zone – looks likely as a Greek default on its IMF loan looms the end of this month and the sides are not talking. Even if there is a last minute reprieve (if there is one coming, we are likely to see indications before the end of this week), it will be a Band-Aid delay at best.

Now Moscow has been having increasing talks with Athens about providing financial assistance in the event the departure takes place. By so doing, Russia is moving to offset EU sanctions by profiting from the destabilization on the EU’s southern flank. Greece is the basket case now, but Italy (where with much fanfare Putin has recently initiated personal diplomacy), Spain, and Portugal are the next dominoes set again to weaken.

In major respects, the world is a very different place than the one in which I was walking two decades ago. Yet a seminal element remains intact. The bipolar war of nerves in Europe has never really left.

And the U.S.? Washington has apparently finalized plans to put long-term forward depots of heavy arms in the Baltics and Eastern Europe… closer to the renewed front and for the immediate rearming of Ukraine.

This is getting ugly… fast. Stay tuned as I report on these brewing geopolitical crises… and the best ways to profit from them.

Please Note: Kent cannot respond to your comments and questions directly. But he can address them in future alerts... so keep an eye on your inbox. If you have a question about your subscription, please email us directly at

  1. Leslie Kaluzny
    June 16th, 2015 at 19:09 | #1

    Excuse me for thinking that with the debt load that burdens our next door brothers & sisters in the USA that maybe war with an old adversary may be what certain elements of America’s political elite pine for to cover their lamentable record of service to their own Nation!
    Russia’s political leadership it seems is just more reality based & skilled to the Realities of World Realpoliteak.
    Today’s American Regime in power (Fragile in Moral Fibre) is very dangerous as they bluster & strut while trying to make up for ‘loss of Face’ in this battle of Realpoliteak with Putin.
    Is Democratic Party incompetence at ‘Foreign Policy’ a good reason to revisit the ‘Charge Of The Light Brigade’ and re-stage an old Crimean War?
    Russia will do what she needs to do in her Sphere of Influence supported by the confidence that America’s current Whitehouse Tenant gave her.

  2. James Brown
    June 17th, 2015 at 01:30 | #2

    If because of global warming coming to the political forefront will the natural gas industry have to turn to hydrogen made from natural gas to save their butts, and if they do can clean energy make the change easily?

    I am a member!

  3. Stephen S. Potter
    June 17th, 2015 at 04:38 | #3

    Dear Dr. Moors:

    I’m rather financially strapped for now but come the 3rd of next month (July,) I’ll be able to join your organization. You made me an offer I’d be the biggest fool on earth if I refused. By the way, photography is my very serious hobby for most of my life and I want to turn it into a lucrative profession and if you can help me in some way toward that end, I’ll be eternally grateful to you. I am now 72 and I want to enjoy great wealth while I still can. I’m a widower living on a fixed income which just doesn’t go very far….I have actually been financially strapped all my life and I am determined to change all that and I shall be looking forward to joining your organization. Thank you most graciously for opening doors for me!

    Stephen S. Potter

  4. Charles E
    June 17th, 2015 at 11:12 | #4

    I am reading the Last Lion about Churchill’s life right now and history is repeating itself. Pacifist leaders in Washington very similar to Baldwin and Chamberlain were as Prime Ministers in England. Foment civil unrest as Hitler and the Nazi’s did in Czeslovakia and Poland and then go in with troops to stop the unrest against ethnic germans and take over the country. Putin is taking a page out of Hitler’s book.

  5. t m cuzdey
    June 21st, 2015 at 22:49 | #5

    Putin is trouble with a capitol t.

  6. art
    June 23rd, 2015 at 16:21 | #6

    are we looking at a civil war

  7. Jeff
    June 26th, 2015 at 02:06 | #7

    I have never heard a bigger load of nonesense…Putin is a man in charge of governing Russia, he was immediately blamed for the shooting down of the plane over Ukrain..and not long after Russia was removed from G8. The destabilizing of Ukrain was orchestrated by certain intelligence agencies to oust the former president of Ukrain..after this a puppet was installed and that is when Russia decided that this was a direct takeover by a foreign power or powers on her border. The united States even as recent as this week has been heavy military weaponry into several Eastern European countries, I would like to see the USA stand by and allow another power to do the same thing on its border. I am after truth, not our western media’s propaganda that has been shaped to meet their continuous end goals. May we support anyone that stands against Tyranny and at the moment Russia is not killing anyone and that can’t be said for the US.

  8. ParadiseSwamp
    July 1st, 2015 at 06:20 | #8

    One thing you seem to have “missed” is that Russia took the Crimea. @Jeff

  1. No trackbacks yet.