Email

China is About to Take Control of Global Oil Markets

by | published April 26th, 2016

Some time ago, while I was advising on a refinery project in Ecuador, I explained here in Oil & Energy Investor how ’s oil policy was evolving.

The country’s objective used to be controlling oil production abroad, with the aim of transporting that oil back home.

But in 2013, Ecuador, the smallest of the OPEC producers, learned the hard way that this objective had changed. After running out of money, both Ecuador and its national oil company had to rely on loans from China to stay afloat.

In return, Beijing gained control over the revenue flow from Ecuadorian oil exports. The oil was allowed to flow anywhere, as long as the proceeds went back to China (as loan repayments).

Now, several of my sources are telling me that China is about to unleash the next step in its plan to control the world’s oil markets.

And this time, the targets can be found in an unsuspecting place. And in an unsuspecting fashion, too…

Iran and Iraq Have Both Been Given a Free Pass by OPEC

Before we get to China, let me first give you some background.

Low oil prices are hitting hard at two of oil’s central players, both of which are expecting to ramp up production – Iraq and Iran.

While both Iraq and Iran are members of OPEC, neither one has had a monthly OPEC production quota for some time. Those quotas are supposed to determine how much oil each member exports to world markets.

It used to be that OPEC calculated expected global demand and then deducted non-OPEC production. What’s left was called the “call on OPEC,” and was divided among members as a monthly quota.

Of course, there is no way to prevent countries from exceeding those quotas. And the current environment of “every country for itself” has effectively rendered the quotas moot.

Iraq continues to suffer from internal political discord, as well as the threat of Daesh. That’s the more pejorative way of referring to the abhorrence that calls itself the “Islamic State” (or IS), and I refuse to even imply that these monsters have anything resembling sovereignty.

Meanwhile, Iran was until recently under Western sanctions and is intent on returning to its pre-sanction production and export levels, as you’ve seen here in Oil & Energy Investor before.

But Iran’s desired volume – in excess of 4 million barrels a day – will probably be reached as early as June, just in time for the next meeting on capping global production, this one to be held in Moscow.

But those levels cannot be sustained, because of Iran’s significant internal problems in both fields and infrastructure.

Both Baghdad and Tehran require large amounts of investment to overcome growing production crises that will test their ability to obtain the export revenues they both need. But this investment is slow in coming. For Iraq, the upfront problems remain security and political instability – companies are worried that the production goals will be undermined by political discord.

This latter point deserves more emphasis than it has received in the West.

Daesh can never control – or even attack – the primary oil fields in Iraq’s Shiite-dominated south. But by putting pressure on a beleaguered government in Baghdad, they nonetheless accomplish the same objective: they paralyze the central administration, halting attempts to ramp up oil production.

OPEC has given both Iraq and Iran a multi-year delay in the enforcement of oil export quotas. In the current climate of excessive production, the quotas have not been applied.

But they will return in short order, especially if a production freeze is reached at the June meeting in Moscow.

However, the problem for both Iraq and Iran is arising from within…

Both Countries are in Desperate Need of Western Oil Expertise

Low oil prices have produced long delays in payments to providers of field services. In the case of Iraq, that problem is now also affecting the international oil company (IOC) majors running the oil fields.

In the case of Iran, sanctions have prevented foreign involvement – banning the Western technology and expertise Iran needs to keep its oil infrastructure from collapsing. Replacing Western companies with Chinese and even Russian field operators has been a disaster. Virtually all production in Iran is now done using domestic field services. That results in inferior, and sometimes nonexistent, work.

A deeper issue is the way both countries give out contracts. In Iraq, outside companies are provided a fixed payment per barrel extracted above a contracted target amount. The result is more properly to be regarded as a field service contract.

Meanwhile, in Iran the constitution and the law prohibit outsiders from owning either land or raw materials inside the country. This means that foreign companies must operate under very bulky and time-consuming buy-back contracts – in which a company is paid in produced oil according to fixed costs and prices negotiated at the beginning.

In neither case does the resulting contract approach anything resembling a joint venture. That means that

  1. the fields remain under the ownership of Iraqi and Iranian national oil companies;
  2. international oil majors (IOCs) cannot place any portion of these oil reserves on their own books.

Both countries have been searching for ways to make the investment more attractive. As you’ve read here before, Tehran has scheduled London meetings with financial sources on three recent occasions, only to have to cancel each time because there was no political consensus back home.

All of this has led to a significant new development – and a new opportunity for China…

This New Financing Approach is Opening the Gates for the Chinese

Baghdad has proposed paying its past due bills with currency bonds rather than cash. The Iraqi Finance Ministry has already begin deploying the paper in the face of an expanding 8%+ budget deficit. These bonds can be traded on the local market, and either cashed in at a discount or used at face value as collateral on loans.

Another approach now under development will apply these bonds to arrearages owed to IOCs. One idea is to use the value of oil reserves in the ground as collateral for these bonds.

It is a move that the IOCs might actually prefer, since it would give them at least some ability to “book” reserve values, albeit indirectly (through the face value of the bonds).

Iran already plays the game of “you pretend to work and we pretend to pay you” with its all-domestic service providers. But Tehran is now considering this bond approach as a possible way of bringing in foreign providers while at the same time avoiding any violations of local “ownership” restrictions.

What would really jumpstart this payment-in-bonds approach would be the ability to utilize the paper in broader local markets, both attracting some value in secondary trading and allowing the face value to work in broader collateral and trading situations. For that to happen, international banks must act as either guarantors of the paper or, in the case of additional issuances, as book runners for the placements.

Here is where the terrain may shift in a seismic way.

Word from several of my sources indicate that Chinese banks (with, of course, the official backing of the government in Beijing) may step in to provide these services.

The move would increase China’s presence in the oil sector on both sides of the Shatt al-Arab (the river separating Iraq and Iran), fund additional Chinese oil imports without actually shelling out hard currency, and take the next step in China’s increasingly sophisticated approach to other people’s oil: gain control over the financing of oil production in both Iran and Iraq.

Chinese national oil companies are already working on entering both the Iraqi and Iranian markets. But the Iraqi-Iranian bond approach will allow China to move ahead one more step in its plan.

Years ago, China would simply buy oil abroad and bring it home. Then, as in Ecuador, it acquired revenues from oil sales in international markets. Now, China wants to gain control over the financing of oil production in other countries.

And it looks like it’s going to work…

This may take geopolitics in the oil sector to a whole new level.

Please Note: Kent cannot respond to your comments and questions directly. But he can address them in future alerts... so keep an eye on your inbox. If you have a question about your subscription, please email us directly at customerservice@oilandenergyinvestor.com

  1. Robert in Vancouver
    April 26th, 2016 at 21:08 | #1

    China’s leaders are doing a lot ‘smart’ things. USA leaders are doing a lot of ‘stupid’ things. Meanwhile, Canada’s leaders are taking selfies and acting foolish.

  2. Dieter Remppel
    April 27th, 2016 at 01:10 | #2

    Did the Chinese take a page from what is supposedly a quote from one of the Rothschild clan?

    I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls Britain’s money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply.

  3. Gary buggs
    April 27th, 2016 at 08:45 | #3

    If the banks in China see an opportunity what is stopping the rest of the banks in the world from doing the same? Or any large hedge fund or investment company with the funds to invest with?

  4. sixpack
    April 27th, 2016 at 10:43 | #4

    surely if that financing comes about then oil production will continue to rise unfettered making the saudi oil production and pacts even more of an irrelevance, putting downward pressure on oil prices? China has no interest in high oil prices, it is an increasing consumer.

    And yet the forecast for oil is around $60 / barrel at the end of the year.

    So not sure what the effect of this move is. US shale production is the key to excess world oil. Will China deliberately force down prices to hurt the US industry? Don’t think they will control enough production.

  5. Adalberto Garza
    April 27th, 2016 at 17:17 | #5

    Let China hold the doggie bag with doggie poop at the end of their agreements !

  6. Robert in Vancouver
    April 27th, 2016 at 18:46 | #6

    @Gary buggs
    I think the difference is that if the risky deadbeat debtors China is dealing with don’t pay, then the debtor knows China will send armed aircraft carriers to collect. So they pay. Hedge funds and banks don’t have that kind of ability to collect so they can’t make deals with deadbeats such as Iran and Ecaudor.

  7. Jim
    April 29th, 2016 at 18:00 | #7

    If Chinese banks are going to handle financing , what currency would be used in the transactions? Didn’t iran refuse the dollar as payment?

  8. Bull
    April 30th, 2016 at 14:37 | #8

    Hmmmm , how about that. China is getting slicker than the oil it is dealing in. Hmmm all the money we sunk int Iraq ,and always wondered howcome we never cashed in on their oil wells. They owe us a ton of money as well as the rest of the world.

  9. ricardo santos
    May 3rd, 2016 at 02:45 | #9

    Excellent & interesting article.

  10. Dick Caruthers
    May 28th, 2016 at 22:48 | #10

    Our leaders are both ignorant & stupid when it comes to dealing with foreign
    despots Our wasted assets in Iraq &
    Afghan are proof of this. We never really wanted to win either of these so
    called ” wars”., just spend a trillion or so for nothing. Really stupid admin in
    Washington we have suffered thru. By the way people, Saudi Arabia is NOT our friend or ally !!! They have proven that since Nov 2014. !!!

  1. No trackbacks yet.