Why No "Silver Bullet" Will Ever Kill Oil

Why No “Silver Bullet” Will Ever Kill Oil

by | published May 5th, 2016

The end of April and beginning of May will always, for me, be “final grades” time. It comes from teaching two generations of university students, and having a crush of exams and research papers to grade this time of year.

Even after leaving the halls of academe, I still find myself feeling the effects. I may have retired physically, but it will stay with me forever.

In the past few days, I was reminded of a particular event from my university days – an event of huge importance to today’s energy markets.

You see, we are fast approaching the end of one energy age… and the beginning of another.

And years ago, a challenging question from a student led me to rethink something big… something that every investor needs to keep in mind.

Especially during the current monumental shift in the energy sector…

Out of the Mouth of Babes

Younger students don’t have the blinders associated with having more background (but often less imagination).

Not knowing conventional thinking, the “kids” just let it rip.

Years ago, a challenging question from an undergrad resulted in a realization that would have a measurable impact in my own professional life.

Of course, there also has to be an environment that allows students to do it.

In my forty years as a university professor, I had two rules about what was allowed in my classroom. Everybody knew them.

First, you could say anything but you better have something to back it up. Second, nobody was permitted to throw physical objects at anybody.

Everything else was just about fair game.

Well on one of these occasions there was a lively conversation underway over what was meant by the idea of progress. A “youngin” challenged me to deny that human advancement depended upon invention.

I immediately did so…at which point half the class rose in opposition.

It was then that a distinction would emerge that I’ve expanded on in several of my later writings…

No Single Energy Source will Replace Oil

An invention is quite rare, I noted. It involves bringing something entirely new into existence.

Innovation, on the other hand, is taking something that already exists and using it in a new way. That I insisted is what drives most of civilization forward. It also highlights that peculiar human proclivity – problem solving.

Much of what I have witnessed in the more than four decades of my involvement in all things energy has reinforced this conviction. Especially when we reach one of those seminal points in human development… like now.

We are coming to the end of one major period in energy usage. This one has been animated by oil, just as the previous epochs ultimately centered on the use of some other primary energy source (coal, steam, wood).

As such, the assumption is that another unique energy source must be found to replace oil – a silver bullet of sorts to slay the beast and usher in the death of crude.

Yet, in point of fact, that has never been the immediate aftermath of change. There has always been a transition in which older and newer energies would intermingle until delivery infrastructures and considerations of efficiency would select the next primary base for economies and cultures.

These days a popular belief holds that some singular energy source (like natural gas) will serve as a bridge between oil and the next dominant stage (renewables are usually the target in these conversations). Nonetheless, this is still looking at development resulting only when one energy type becomes dominant, replacing some other (and earlier) mainstay source.

Those of you who have followed Oil & Energy Investor for a while know that I think things are going to be a bit different this time around…

Energy Diversity is the Goal

Today, we are experiencing the rise of a genuine energy balance that involves an intended, longer-term interconnection among an increasing variety of energy sources. This is not simply a transitional period filling in the space between one “king” energy and another.

Rather the variety is going to be intentional. The balance among energy sources is the actual objective, not merely some makeshift interregnum.

However, there is one caveat to all of this. And it harkens back to that classroom years ago. Because we are at the end of a major technological advancement cycle, a new, intensified wave of innovation is now required.

For much of the past twenty years, advances in how we produce, transport, and use energy have largely involved reducing size, increasing efficiency, and applying economies of scale. All of these have improved the bottom line for the practitioners positioned to benefit.

This has been driven by innovation, not invention. But we are now at the end of this cycle. It has enabled (in some cases dramatic) reductions in operating expenses and supply costs. The impact to solar energy from the amazing reductions in the cost of components is a good case in point.

And it is in the solar energy segment that the most dramatic changes have taken place. Solar today has grid parity (it is equivalent in cost to other sources of electricity, such as coal or natural gas) in U.S. 29 states.

That number is expected to be 42 by 2020.

But solar (and wind, for that matter) now share a common problem with the development curves in other energies. And for innovation to kick in at this point will require a change in perspective…

This Energy Shift will Require Innovation – Which Creates Profits

That’s because we now face two compelling issues, common to all energy sources.

The first involves setting up redundant energy production and delivery systems – without these becoming either cost ineffective or environmentally challenging. Any working energy balance will require a seamless ability to move from one energy source to another as the market and situation warrant.

The second is fast becoming the elephant in the room for any discussion of meeting energy demand moving forward. The world in general (and the U.S. in particular) is rapidly approaching a point where massive energy infrastructure replacements will be required. Everything from where we produce or generate power, to how we transport and distribute it, will have to be rebuilt and extended.

Both of these provide us with a choice. We can replicate what exists today, or we can innovate once again to meet the challenges of a new period in development.

My bet is on the latter.

And whenever a new wave of innovation strikes, investors who get in early see huge profit potentials. Just imagine investing in the right oil companies at the end of the 18th century, or in Ford at the start of the automotive age.

I’ll be tracking this coming wave of energy innovation closely. Stay tuned for more as this shift ushers in some great new profit centers for investors.

Please Note: Kent cannot respond to your comments and questions directly. But he can address them in future alerts... so keep an eye on your inbox. If you have a question about your subscription, please email us directly at customerservice@oilandenergyinvestor.com

  1. Mark
    May 5th, 2016 at 22:59 | #1

    Mr. Moors,
    I do not agree that you think that we are in the midst of something that will be able to replace oil and its derivatives in our lifetime. There is no replacement yet found that can beat the dollar to dollar value that oil gives to our way of life. Sure we can try to do solar, but it is just a leftist green view that costs so much more than the natural resources we use now. Sure there could be improvements in how clean we make this energy, but as we stand right now, there is no logical replacement.
    I would like to hear your comments on the Fort McMurray wild fire please.
    Thank you.

  2. michael stefko
    May 7th, 2016 at 15:46 | #2

    Years ago I heard of a plan to connect the North American, European, and Russian electric grids (across the Bearing Strait), resulting in a huge savings in transmission costs. This was before China and India could be added to the mix. Could this be something you are considering? Of course today, with Russia becoming less friendly, the chances of this occurring would probably be nil. Too bad.

  3. May 11th, 2016 at 19:55 | #3

    Mr. Moors,
    Could you give us your thoughts on the future of those economies that presently are virtually solely oil dependent or “mono product economies”?
    Thank you

  4. K.C.Somaratna
    June 10th, 2016 at 20:46 | #4

    I have been promoting Highway Solarisation as a probable solution to this. It is laying PV solar panels above and along the highways. It stems from few key things; Highway is the manmade structure which absorbs the highest percentage of solar radiation out 0f all manmade structures, transportation is the energy usage which emits the highest amounts of GHG gases and waste heat per unit of energy actually used and thus the usage where an actual unit of energy used is most expensive both to the user as well as to society, highway is where the energy need to be generated if the solar energy generated is to be used to prevent the highest GHG and waste heat for a solar panel already made and fetch the highest price, and this addresses all the four disadvantages of PV solar – need large land area, need storage, is distributed and is expensive. Any comments I have written extensively to Sri Lankan papers on this and also to Dr.Steven Chu – then Sec of Energy, President of ASCE, Mr. Jack Gerard then CEO of API. Thank you

  5. April 4th, 2019 at 22:26 | #5

    Thank you for your insight. A great opportunity for parts of this country, is floating solar. You can create a distributed generation model that will have a positive impact on the grids resiliency as well as its reliability.

  6. tony petres
    April 5th, 2019 at 10:30 | #6

    Trendy things like the “green new deal” are doomed at the outset. A recent move in Germany to electrify a high percentage of that nations automobiles (based on wind and solar) is failing to the point that the government is looking to develop a large deposit of coal lying beneath the Black Forest. And why? The move is needed to try and generate enough electricity (using coal fired plants) to power the nations growing reliance on electric vehicles. Like my college chemistry prof was fond of saying, “there is no free lunch”!

  1. No trackbacks yet.