This "Hybrid Breakthrough" Could Reshape the Entire Energy Sector

This “Hybrid Breakthrough” Could Reshape the Entire Energy Sector

by | published August 30th, 2016

Alternative and renewable energy sources have been making some impressive gains over the past few years in both reducing the cost of generation and improving efficiency. The price of U.S. solar power, for example, has dropped more than 70% since 2009 alone.

But the “holy grail” remains something called “grid parity” – providing power at a cost equal to or less than the price of power obtained from the grid (read: from coal or natural gas).

Of course, the wind doesn’t always blow, and the sun doesn’t always shine. That means backup systems are needed, pushing up costs.

The solution may be to use renewable energy sources that don’t have the down time of solar or wind. Biofuels (from algae, waste, wood shavings, etc.) is one possibility we have discussed here in Oil & Energy Investor recently.

But another very promising “hybrid” approach has recently been proposed.

If it succeeds, it could revolutionize the entire U.S. energy sector…

Wave Power Has No Downtime

I’m talking about a new form of wave power.

Ocean and tidal waves are predictable and don’t suffer from interruptions, nor does using them for power have any adverse environmental impacts. But the cost has usually limited the application of wave power to cases where there’s some other compelling reason to opt for this technology.

For example, the U.S. Navy introduced wave power at its Hawaiian installations for national security purposes – by severing the connection to the state’s energy grid, the Navy’s bases are no longer vulnerable to power loss in case of an attack.

Of course, that case doesn’t address whether wave power could become a larger component in providing power to the grid itself…

This is a New Kind of Energy “Hybrid”

All studies agree that electricity demand will be accelerating over the next two decades. That makes it essential to have reliable power generation from a number of sources.

And that sets the stage for what may be a “hybrid” breakthrough in wave power. In this case, the “hybrid” connection is not between two different energy sources, but between two different ways of producing wave power.

Recently in Altenergymag, James Sack of private company Kinetic Wave Power, LLC discussed a development pioneered by the company that may hold some promise (you can access the entire article here).

The approach is called the PowerGinand is designed to increase power conversion rates – which translates into how much useful energy is ultimately provided from an energy source’s potential total.

As Jim notes in his article, photovoltaic power (that is, solar) has an estimated maximum conversion rate of 24% at mid-day, while wind is at 45% maximum. Meanwhile, conventional ocean power provides 8-18%.

And then there is the matter of affordability…

The PowerGin is at Grid Parity

According to Jim’s estimates, solar power can cost 15-30 cents/KW, wind power 5-7 cents/KW, and existing ocean technologies 8-16 cents/KW. Coal, meanwhile, remains the world’s main power source and its cost (not counting environmental costs) is an affordable 4.8-5.5 cents/KW.

And that’s where Jim’s company comes in. They claim to have developed a breakthrough hybrid system that uses the motion of coastal waves to generate power, without any social impact or use of water.

The cost, Jim claims, is at grid parity with coal.

Now, the motion of the oceans has long looked promising. One study out of Oregon State University calculated that just 0.2% of the unused energy contained in the world’s oceans would be enough to meet the power needs of the entire globe… five times.

But wave power technology, as the cost comparison above shows, has never been cheap enough for full-scale deployment.

Kinetic Wave Power claims to have changed that with their “breakthrough” hybrid approach. Here’s how…

Cutting Costs by Using All Parts of a Wave

In essence, waves move in two ways: vertically (the rise and fall of a wave), and horizontally (the push and pull forwards and backwards, as well as the swirling, of a wave).

Existing wave power systems tap only one of these sources of energy (typically the vertical one). But Kinetic Wave Power’s PowerGin uses both, as well as being able to generate power from the smaller, less consistent waves common along the U.S. coast.

The system uses two 80 feet long rotors with “buckets” attached to them. These buckets, as you can see in the image below, capture waves and are pushed down by them, causing the whole rotor to spin.

Meanwhile, a ramp extended between the two rotors pushes water up, turning the horizontal movement of water into a vertical wave that then pushes down on the rotor “buckets,” generating even more power.

The claims for the new system are resulting in active market interest. For example, the company claims its system can achieve a conversion rate of 20-30% in weak and inconsistent U.S. coastal waves, as opposed to the 12-18% achieved by existing wave power.

And for any fans of solar power out there, Jim points out that waves are really a concentrated form of solar and wind power (as well as tidal effects, of course), with an energy density 8-10 times that of wind power.

A “park” of these generators could potentially power an industrial site or a large city, all out of sight out in the ocean.

Limited field studies of the PowerGin system have been encouraging, but there is still need for more detailed testing. However, if the hybrid system proves commercially viable, this may be a true game-changer for renewables, and for the energy industry as a whole.

I’ll be keeping a close eye on this one…

Please Note: Kent cannot respond to your comments and questions directly. But he can address them in future alerts... so keep an eye on your inbox. If you have a question about your subscription, please email us directly at

  1. Malcolm Rawlingson
    August 30th, 2016 at 17:35 | #1

    Wave power is the only one of the “renewables” that has ever made any sense to me….apart from hydroelectric of course. Tidal power has been harnessed at St. Malo in France for decades. It has a great number of advantages. It is mostly below the sea surface so unobtrusive…unlike ugly windmills..I have seen many charming a beautiful areas of Canada converted to wind farms that defies any concept of “good for the environment”. Industrial solar…you know the type that takes up vast areas of land for very low power output and appalling capacity factors…is even worse. Where once were productive apple orchards are now row upon row of solar collectors. Any effort to convince me that is good for the environment is lost on me I am afraid.
    Once wave generation costs are reduced I am hoping that the idiotic rush into solar and wind at huge cost to taxpayers via subsidies is ended and they will be removed from the North American landscape replaced by unobtrusive high power high capacity factor wave powered tu7rbines. Not soon enough for me.

  2. Ron
    August 30th, 2016 at 22:26 | #2

    It’s about time this comes into play since the technology idea has been around for decades , why does it take so long for simple ideas that work get to market?c’mon America , get with it! And what ever happened to the magnet generator, free electricity !

  3. Lloyd Greene
    September 1st, 2016 at 18:16 | #3

    Where in the equation is Dr Einstein’s $48 trillion “Solar Ride” to the “Energy Revolution”. The holy Grail from the Sun should overtake all other proposals.

  4. September 2nd, 2016 at 19:20 | #4

    How many years before it is a real investment opportunity?

  5. September 3rd, 2016 at 09:44 | #5

    I was unaware of wave power. Sounds quite viable to me. However, my concern is the power & control the large corporations will have over any development because they are into the ‘bottom line’ of any market. Would the consumer actually see the cheaper costs? My skepticism causes me to say “no!”.

  6. Bill Metcalfe
    September 3rd, 2016 at 10:32 | #6

    Would you be kind enough to do an update on the forward looking use of uranium. Thank you.

  7. September 4th, 2016 at 11:08 | #7

    What would be the best way to invest in this technology

    October 20th, 2016 at 19:02 | #8

    If a small solid island is suitable for a nuclear reactor, how far from inhabited area should it be considered reasonably safe?

  1. No trackbacks yet.