What Wall Street Doesn't Get About Friday's Oil Price Drop

What Wall Street Doesn’t Get About Friday’s Oil Price Drop

by | published September 12th, 2016

On Friday, U.S. stocks declined by the most in a single day since the Brexit referendum, with the Dow down 394 points.

This bloodbath was sparked by Federal Reserve Bank of Boston President Eric Rosengren putting a September rate rise back on the table, and investors started heading for the doors. Expect other Fed members to spend this week calming the markets.

Friday’s effect on crude oil prices, however, was immediate.

A 23% rally stopped right in its tracks and reversed. When official oil trading closed at 2:30p.m. Eastern, WTI (West Texas Intermediate, the benchmark oil grade traded in New York) was down 3.7% for the day.

Brent (the equivalent benchmark set in London, and more widely used globally) was down 3.9%.

But even as oil started recovering from those dips on Monday, scaremongers started calling for even lower prices.

They’re blaming – of all things – the weather.

You can safely ignore them – here’s why…

A Rate Rise Would Lower Oil Prices – if it Ever Came Around

Now, any concern about a Fed rate hike, such as the comments that started Friday’s sell-off, will likely lead to the dollar rising against other currencies.

That also pushes oil prices down, because virtually all oil sales worldwide are denominated in dollars. When the exchange value of the dollar rises, it now takes traders more of their own currency to buy the same amount of oil. That decreases global oil demand, pushing prices down.

Of course, when the markets realize that there will not be a rate increase until (probably) December, matters will readjust. In the interim, rumor-fueled volatility will rule the oil market.

With this in mind, the only tangible factor the so-called “experts” can latch on to is the import situation. They assume that imports determine the margins in oil supply.

Hence, the recent passing of Hurricane Hermine should translate into increased imports, rising supply, and lower prices.

They couldn’t be more wrong…

Oil Prices are Set to Level Off – for Now…

By Monday morning these pundits were warning of another drop in oil prices as supply recovered from the disruptions caused by Hurricane Hermine and other U.S. storms.

The argument goes like this: By interrupting shipping around Florida and the East Coast, Hurricane Hermine caused a temporary decline in U.S. oil imports, causing the price of oil to spike.

To the extent that import cuts did result in lower-than-expected oil supply, the impact would be higher prices. That’s especially the case when you consider the historically massive drawdown from oil stockpiles that we saw last week.

So, even without other factors coming into play, expect oil prices to level off in the short-term.

After all, without any change in oil’s underlying fundamentals, there are no grounds to continue an overheated pricing picture. Yes, the international balance between supply and demand is moving forward and massive extractable reserves have been kept out of the market by producers.

These might in themselves provide an equilibrium as the main balance sets in. But after such a noticeable rise of late, that equilibrium will produce some pullback in prices.

But that still leaves the issue of imports…

U.S. Oil Imports are Less and Less Important

In short, imports are not as important to U.S oil prices as they used to be.

To begin with, the percentage of U.S. crude oil that comes from imports has gone down. As you all know, the U.S. market has come a long way from where it was just a few years ago. Back then, it looked like America would have to rely on foreign sources (including Canada) for some 70% of daily demand.

The shale revolution changed that quickly.

In less than five years, that import dependence had been reduced to less than 40%, and it’s widely assumed that the U.S. will become energy independent within a decade.

Even better, when you consider Canadian production to be “domestic,” that independence seemed to be arriving much faster.

Of course, at the time, oil was trading at $100 a barrel. At that price, local supply made more sense than imports.

However, following the Saudi-inspired OPEC decision – made on Thanksgiving Day, 2014 – to keep production levels (and then raise them) in defense of market share, things started changing. The relationship between domestic oil production and crude imports became centered on one thing…

Prices Determine Oil Imports – Not the Other Way Around…


Aside from a few days in June, WTI prices for oil have remained below $50 a barrel for more than a year. That is significantly below the breakeven cost for most deep, horizontally-drilled and fracked shale wells in the US.

In other words, the bulk of unconventional reserves cannot be extracted at current oil prices.

Instead, low-cost imports become more palatable. But remember, the “import” label applies to oil from Canada as well as from overseas. Currently, oil from north of the border is almost completely delivered via pipelines, which are virtually at capacity.

That leaves other imports as leverage against domestic production in an ongoing cost calculation.

U.S. refineries now export more processed oil products than any other country on Earth. This already plays a huge role in estimating import levels – since import levels are determined largely by looking at refinery margins, which in turn are influenced by oil product exports.

Furthermore, Congress is now allowing exports of crude oil for the first time in over four decades. This will take a bit longer to become a major element.

As the price of oil slowly rises, the price difference between imported and domestic oil will narrow, and the apparent advantage of lower cost imports will disappear. OPEC may be providing discounts to attract additional sales in Asia, but there are no discounts coming to American shores.

So make no mistake…

Even when we are talking about the impact of disrupted imports on U.S. oil prices, the cost calculus is really working itself out in the broader global market.

In the end, whether we import oil or not will depend on global oil prices, not on temporary bad weather. So you can safely ignore the scaremongers that point to imports as a sign of lower oil prices.

In fact, oil is set to go up before the end of the year…

Please Note: Kent cannot respond to your comments and questions directly. But he can address them in future alerts... so keep an eye on your inbox. If you have a question about your subscription, please email us directly at customerservice@oilandenergyinvestor.com

  1. Malcolm Rawlingson
    September 12th, 2016 at 21:19 | #1

    Always well thought out arguments Kent and always a joy to read. Of course there are many factors that influence the price of oil or any commodity. What one needs to decide is which factors are the dominant ones. Oil markets are very complex. One of the attractions of importing heavy crude from Canada is that some refineries were converted to process heavy oil from Venezuela (originally). With the operation of the Keystone pipeline and its extension into the south Texas refinery belt this crude is now readily available (albeit at capacity) to refiners. Given the exchange rate of course it makes sense to import Canadian crude, process it into finished product and profit from the mark-up…that is simply good business. The Keystone XL pipeline would make even more crud available except Obama dislikes Canadian Crude (Venezuelan crude – far dirtier) is apparently OK though. Political hypocrisy if ever I saw it.
    But, I think investors are sensing that in the long term oil is going to be in decline as a fuel. Electric cars are starting – albeit very slowly – to supplant oil derived fuels. I see more and more charging stations popping up and more and more Tesla’s on the road. It is just a matter of time before those small inroads become an inrush and oil prices will never see $100 a barrel again. Saudi Arabia knows it although officially they say that it will not affect their business before 2050. That is why they want to sell part of Aramco while there are still people dumb enough to buy. If they leave it much longer Aramco and all the oil in the ground is going to become a virtually worthless asset. Just like West Virginian coal and whaling ships….not worth the paper they are written on.Times they are a-changing Kent. Big oil has had its day. I moved all my investments out of oil two years ago. Not only is OPEC a spent force…oil is too.Just a matter of time. The technological juggernaut that is represented by driverless electric vehicles has left the station and is headed right for the oil producers. They have had their day in the SUn.

  2. Jesus Brizal
    September 13th, 2016 at 01:06 | #2

    That’s good news to hear. Thank your very much for the good advise.

  3. Bob
    September 15th, 2016 at 15:27 | #3

    Press rumors have it that money is pouring in from the Middle East, mostly Saudis, to purchase depressed US and Canadian oil assets (source: M. Katusa). Any truth to the rumors, and if so, anyway to track this?

  4. C. T. Spines
    September 17th, 2016 at 11:34 | #4

    The short story is normal declines on very large #s like 4% yearly decline on 96mmbod world demand. My abacus says we need to find 4mmbod each year to stay even. Roughly the same amount we recovered from US Hz Resource Manufacturing but the “rub” is 3 fold
    1) The time frames to 4mmbod was 6 years.
    2) Guessing the cost was “north” of $1mmm with overhead etc, Seems impossible to get a true handle on past CAPEX due to the hype from Wall Street promoting their favorite New & Improved “Oil Manufacturing” stock. Mother Nature and Manufacturing generally do not mix very predictively when below ground. Most Hz Resourceo wells exhibit very steep initial decline rates and will take years until they aggregate to 4% matching world declines,
    3) Even the MEW “Oil Manufacturing” darlings will never experience the inorganic growth allowed the 1st wave @ 6 to 1, and above, “internally generated CF to Debt ratios”

    From where will this 4mmbod come with the maga projects strangled by the Majors seeking cash for dividends?

  1. No trackbacks yet.