Email

The Strange Tale of the “Phantom Oil” Glut – and Why It’s About to Vanish

by | published October 20th, 2016

Marina and I are flying back home as you read this. But before we left, I had a fascinating conversation with a French ex-oil trader – a conversation that revealed something remarkable that’s about to happen to the oil price.

Jacques Donat, the former oil trader, is in his mid-thirties. He now works for a mid-sized Dutch oil tanker firm.

You’d think that means he makes money by shipping oil from producers to refiners. Turns out, nothing could be further from the truth…

What Jacques told me shows just how much the oil market has been manipulated to its very core…

As well as how the price of oil is about to react – fast – now that this manipulation is about to unravel.

Here’s what you need to know…

Oil Tankers are for Storage, Not Shipping

Jacques’ company still has tankers, and they’re still in the oil business. It’s just that the company’s fleet no longer hauls crude anywhere. These days, the tankers are used as floating oil storage units.

This approach became popular as global oil prices collapsed but production continued unabated. With prices too low to put all that oil on the market, producers instead resorted to using tankers as a way of keeping extracted oil away from the market – and away from influencing oil prices.

Now, there are two factors that are crucial to this strategy being successful…

“Floating” Oil Storage Only Makes Sense When Future Oil Prices are Higher

First, storing oil in tankers for sale later is only profitable if oil is trading in what’s called “contango” – that is, oil for delivery in the future fetches a higher price than oil for delivery today. When that’s true, and the difference is large enough to cover the costs of storage, traders can make more money by storing oil in tankers and selling it later.

Second, the world’s overall storage capacity limits how much this strategy can be used.

Of course, as you’ve seen here in Oil & Energy Investor, Iran had been utilizing tankers to store its own production during Western sanctions against its nuclear program.

At the time, I suggested that initial rises in their exports would come more from storage than from increasing production given the pronounced field problems Iran has been experiencing.

Well, I had a long and very interesting discussion with Jacques over how “floating” – that is, in tanker storage – excess oil supply influenced the market. Given current assumptions about a worldwide “oil glut” putting a ceiling on price increases, one would think Jacques’s tankers would be a part of that ceiling.

But his take on the situation was quite unexpected…

Oil in “Floating” Storage Has Been Falling Fast – But No One Noticed

It seems the profits of both his company and the traders who come to own the oil stored in its tankers have been increasing. That’s because the actual volume held in these floating storage units has been dramatically cut.

He estimates that, at its height, the overall amount of oil in floating storage had been anywhere between 30 and 50 million barrels, depending on whose figures you accept. Currently, however, he estimates that the number is only about 10 million – and that’s even when you factor in the oil stored by Iran.

In other words, at least from the European perspective, that elusive oil balance – and the higher oil prices it will bring – may be coming much quicker than anticipated. Almost right on cue, Saudi Energy Minister Khalid al-Falih announced the same conclusion yesterday.

But no one seems to be talking about this. The business news media is still stuck repeating its “oil glut” mantra.

And the information from Jacques is far from the end of the story.

You see, back in the U.S., oil storage numbers have been acting strange for some time now…

U.S. Has Millions of “Phantom Oil” Barrels in Storage

Once again, oil storage figures are not telling us what we assumed.

The expected oil glut, which shows up in the Energy Information Administration’s weekly oil report, apparently doesn’t exist in the actual oil storage around the country, as Art Berman and Matt Mushalik recently discovered.

They analyzed the EIA’s numbers, and noticed a rising disparity between the apparently “simple” calculation of how much oil is in U.S. storage, and what numbers are reported.

Now, there are essentially three ways crude is stored: underground; tanker farms and terminals; and refinery intake. The first two are very predictable and can be calculated directly, while the third one is trickier and can only be estimated.

The same goes for the less reliable oil production and import numbers.

So the U.S. government energy data assembler, the EIA, usually determines changes to the amount of oil in storage as follows:

Stock Change = Domestic Production + Net Imports – Crude Oil Input to Refineries

And when that doesn’t match up with the data from underground and tanker storage, the EIA assumes the problem comes from the less accurate production, import, or refinery data, and “adjusts” the numbers accordingly. If minimal, these adjustments can be safely ignored.

But over the last several years, the differences have often represented as much as 60% of the total number.

In other words, at least on paper, there’s a lot of oil in U.S. storage – more than 400 million barrels – that doesn’t appear to come from either domestic production or from imports.

And there’s only one explanation for such a huge discrepancy…

The Oil Market is Being Manipulated

As Art and Matt point out, the production, refinery intake, and import numbers are far more reliable than they might appear. After all, producers and refiners have a strong incentive to move oil about their books to decrease their tax liability. Government agencies, on the other hand, are very interested in getting accurate data on production, sales (to refineries), and imports, in order to maximize tax revenues.

And once you eliminate under-reported production and imports and over-reported refinery intakes as the explanation for the hugely over-estimated oil storage numbers, there’s only one possible explanation left…

The amount of oil in storage, whether underground or in tankers, is being vastly over-reported. As the authors conclude, the glut probably exists more on paper than in real oil.

Or as I would put it: someone is manipulating the market.

This may also explain some rather extraordinary numbers that the EIA has been releasing over the last two months…

As “Phantom Oil” Disappears, Oil Prices Will Go Up

Over that time, the EIA’s weekly numbers have been showing historically high reductions in oil storage, significantly beyond anything that was anticipated by market analysts.

Yesterday’s numbers are a good case in point. The EIA reported a drawdown of 5.2 million barrels of oil from U.S. storage for the week ending October 15. That’s more than three times what the market “experts” had anticipated.

On the other hand, the amount of oil distillates, especially gasoline, in storage increased.

This single-week snapshot shows how difficult it is for refiners to keep storing oil while at the same time trying to avoid paying taxes on it. The EIA relies on figures voluntarily provided by producers and refiners.

However, it must ultimately square those numbers with what exists in the market.

All these ploys by refiners and producers become more difficult to hide when the market starts assuming that oil prices are heading up, not down – which is exactly what has happened.

With OPEC moving toward a production cap, and Russia leaning toward supporting it (at least in principle), the price floor for oil is rising. In this environment, the advantage for, say, refiners of carrying an apparent oil surplus on the books keeps shrinking.

I’ve suggested several times in the past that speculators bridging “paper barrels” (oil futures contracts) and “wet barrels” (actual consignments of oil being traded) have been profiting from the difference in price between the two.

Given the (now disappearing) “phantom oil surplus” we seem to have on both sides of the Atlantic, I asked Jacques whether he thought speculators were making money this way.

He simply smiled and said, “Why do you think a guy like me, who used to trade oil now pursues profit spreads by leaving oil offshore?”

Point taken.

But with this “phantom oil” glut now starting to disappear, speculators may have a harder time making money the way they used to…

And the price of oil will rise as a direct result.

Please Note: Kent cannot respond to your comments and questions directly. But he can address them in future alerts... so keep an eye on your inbox. If you have a question about your subscription, please email us directly at customerservice@oilandenergyinvestor.com

  1. Bob Schubring
    October 20th, 2016 at 16:28 | #1

    The question that needs asking, is “what happens to the Carbon Credit that’s created, when a phantom barrel of oil is made to vanish from inventory?”

    Volkswagen made a nice chunk of change by cooking the books on their emissions tests, creating the false impression that their cars emitted less carbon per mile, than they actually emit.

    If an oil company can use these accounting tricks to create paper oil it carries on it’s books, it ought to be able to pretend it made the environment cleaner by not using the imaginary oil.

    Given that Mount Erebus, Antarctica, can cause a rise in global sea levels and a simultaneous drop in global temperatures, by altering the rate at which the Ross Ice Shelf collapses into the ocean, it’s entirely possible that most of the carbon and climate data that are used in Europe to calculate the carbon credits which companies must buy, if they are to continue importing Russian gas and burning it to heat metal and make products, are manipulated.

  2. Kim Paisley
    October 20th, 2016 at 17:03 | #2

    Dr. Moors: Understand and agree on your Oil (possible) price + through your investigations. What / how would you suggest in investing (method)s stocks / commodities etc. (to be contrary in todays market), in the possibility of the Oil market increase in value much sooner than expected !

  3. Cohle
    October 20th, 2016 at 18:18 | #3

    I have a question about how oil stored on tankers is accounted for…
    When those barrels are transferred offshore are they removed from the storage calculation under net imports or oil inputs to refineries? I would assume that they are being included as imports when they are brought onshore, but if they aren’t removed from storage when they are transferred offshore, they would essentially be double counted, correct?

  4. October 22nd, 2016 at 11:52 | #4

    Here in Colorado oil is high enough that we are drilling–in the last few months a “big as Saudi” field was found–the higher it goes the more we”ll drill–having already become the world’s largest producer
    Stan

  5. sir c v raman noble prize winner
    October 25th, 2016 at 03:52 | #5

    kent, i also read a research report this was published in 2008 and covers variuos senate hearings on oil price manipulation by wallstreet via ICE futures. as you know ICE exchange has office n London and ICE futures are not regulated by CFTC just like NYMEX is regulated. therefore dont you think this research is an eye opener? i will provide u the link.
    those barbarians at Goldman Sachs are at it. i think now the price is being kept low to facilitate a Hillary victory. let me tell you she will lose big time this elections. om shanti om!

  6. Barbara Polk
    October 31st, 2016 at 13:35 | #6

    This explains why u can always count 10-12 tankers sitting off the shore at Galveston waiting to dock at Texas City refineries. I thought we just needed another refinery-I think BOB finally got enough funds to issue a release and one is being built on the coast after about 50 years-I think in Tecase.
    Wonder what revenues were paid in the past to keep production down and prices high. Hummy, thus might be a great story for a real industrious investigative reporter

  7. Emery S.
    November 3rd, 2016 at 17:05 | #7

    There can be no doubt about the cut backs of global oil production during periods of low oil prices. The US shale production is relatively new with enormous capacity that caused the price war and currently under utilized. Are we saying that as the floating oil inventory is being used up oil prices will increase and the unused capacity will remain unused? Essentially we are saying that the demand, supply and price relationship simply does nor exist. This makes no sense to me at all.

  8. Raspard
    November 22nd, 2016 at 17:12 | #8

    US shale production is underutilised because of high production costs; uneconomic at current low oil prices. Should S&D relationship bring oil prices above $60 US shale becomes profitable resource and production will probably be ramped up, reducing prices in the longer term. Usual commodities cycle scenario, but on steroids.

  1. No trackbacks yet.