Email

How Two “Zombie” Funds are Disrupting Oil Prices

by | published June 8th, 2017

Last December, Credit Suisse Group AG (CS), closed two very popular ways of betting on oil to the public.

Both were exchange-traded notes (ETNs) pegged to oil prices, and both had been multi-billion dollar plays that allowed regular people to profit from on swings in oil prices.

But while there’s no public price listed anymore, financial institutions keep trading these “zombie” notes…

And it’s massively distorting oil prices, as we saw with yesterday’s 5% drop in oil prices.

Here’s what you need to know – and how to benefit…

These ETNs Used to Bring Profits to Regular Investors

These ETNs were 3x “bull” and “bear” notes, respectively. That’s to say, the bullish one – VelocityShares 3x Long Crude Oil ETN (UWTI) – rises in value three times more than the New York benchmark for oil does, West Texas Intermediate (WTI).

Meanwhile, the bearish one – VelocityShares 3x Inverse Crude Oil ETN (DWTI) – moves up three times as fast as WTI falls (and vice versa).

Of course, both also lose value three times as fast as WTI moves against them. That makes both risky for regular investors, and are certainly not the kinds of securities you put in a portfolio hoping to send junior to college.

These are very volatile.

Nonetheless, the folks in my Micro Energy Trader trading service scored 98.75% and 127.13% gains as we moved in and out of UWTI.

Urgent: For his Micro Energy Trader members, Kent is tracking a tiny defense contractor that just got millions of dollars’ worth of Pentagon contracts. Its share price is set to skyrocket, but you only have until midnight (ET) to learn how to make your move. Click here for the full details.

DWTI, the bearish ETN, was less capitalized, and I always regarded it as having too much risk for retail investors.

But here’s what’s really interesting about both UWTI and DWTI today.

While Credit Suisse dropped them from general trading and stopped providing daily trading values (thereby making them unusable for normal investors), the two notes remained in use.

For the individual investor, other less liquid clones replaced them. However, these have even greater volatility and insufficient trading volume, making them prone to extreme swings and unjustifiably excessive levels of risk.

But among oil traders, UWTI and DWTI are spoken of in the present tense. They still exist on the secondary market – meaning investors can trade them with each other.

And in this current “zombie” form, both are beginning to distort the underlying price of oil…

Private Trading of these “Zombie” Notes is Distorting the Market

These days, oil traders use the two ETNs as “indicators” or “barometers” of the oil market. Or at least, that’s what Credit Suisse says.

Yet, traded privately – without any market value published for public view – UWTI, DWTI, and other derivatives are instead driving magnified profits for the very guys disfiguring the prices to begin with.

This is hardly the first time these folks have figured out how to take control over the connection between “paper” barrels (futures contracts) and “wet” barrels (actual oil consignments).

The difference this time around is the impact.

Remember, each of these notes carries a 300% markup on the actual value change in the underlying commodity.

Of course, if a heavy-hitting futures contract mover has made a move either for higher or lower prices, or even if the fellow is reacting to perceived market developments, cutting a series of futures contracts, options, and other derivatives preceded by buying the privately available UWTI or DWTI (or a spread derivative on them)will provide the opportunity for a profit…

A profit that’s well beyond what’s justified by the change in oil value itself.

Normally, the low trading volume of UWTI and DWTI would be a signal that the stock (or ETN) has problems. After all, low liquidity is usually an indication that volatility follows any uptake in trading.

Except in this case.

UWTI and DWTI are today almost exclusively traded among institutions and trades that control both paper and wet barrels. If the same party does not have positions in both, they will pair off with players owning the “other side” of the transaction.

I say “almost exclusively” here because the continued participation of Credit Suisse and other finance houses is also shielded from public view.

What this “new” practice shows is the latest step in a long but accelerating attempt to make profits from artificially manipulating the market…

Thank the Manipulators for Yesterday’s Oil Price Dip

The private use of bull and bear ETNs may not be the cause of market events, but they are certainly magnifying the impact.

Of the two, greater profits are made by combining shorts of oil with DWTI (the bearish of the two ETNs). If the past two and a half years have taught anything, it is easier to move oil prices down than up.

As a result, managing the actual oil involved (the paper barrel/wet barrel moves) can magnify the near-term gains even more. That means that we experience declines in crude oil prices greater than what the market itself would justify.

Take yesterday, for example. My contacts advised me that the volume of privately-traded DWTI notes early this week spiked.

Overlooking who the counterparty was in these transactions (even though the reality that there has to be a bank or equivalent operating as a clearing house in the mix somewhere), the 5% decline in WTI was way out proportion to a three million barrel-a-day rise in production.

It was also curious that the American Petroleum Institute (API) estimate earlier in the week called for a decline, while the later Energy Information Administration (EIA) figures showed the rise.

The difference between the two ended up larger than for any week since early last year.

Remember, both rely upon the industry for the figures. They have no independent ability to validate any of the figures.

As we’re all learning, it’s difficult enough to navigate the oil market these days without profiteers putting their thumbs on the scales.

P.S. These huge – and artificial – oil price moves aren’t just hurting energy investors. They’re absolutely lethal to OPEC, which cannot survive without higher crude prices. And now, a new superfuel discovered right here in America, could allow us to form “the new OPEC.” Click here to see your full briefing.

Please Note: Kent cannot respond to your comments and questions directly. But he can address them in future alerts... so keep an eye on your inbox. If you have a question about your subscription, please email us directly at customerservice@oilandenergyinvestor.com

  1. Bob Schubring
    June 8th, 2017 at 21:43 | #1

    What can be learned from this news, is that one could hedge ones’ own oil needs by owning part of a workable oil field.

    A building contractor I knew, did that. He’d bid on big paving and earthmoving jobs, where the price of diesel oil to propel the bulldozers, could swing by enough to be the difference between profit and loss. Then he learned about stripper wells…old oil fields past their prime, that can be pumped a few days a month for a little oil. When prices sag, field owners think about getting rid of stripper wells because they just don’t pay enough to keep a maintenance crew working on them.

    So our contractor bought a few such stripper wells at a good price. If oil prices went up, he sold crude oil at a profit, and lost profit on his construction jobs. If oil went down, he left the crude oil in the ground, and made profit on his construction jobs.

    Using that capability, he started bidding very low on big construction jobs, knowing that the price of diesel oil wasn’t going to force him to lose money finishing the work. And he won some big jobs. Last time I checked, the guy owned 52 cement trucks, 3 kilns, and 3 rock quarries.

    I should look him up and ask him if he’ll be getting any work out of the Trump Infrastructure push.

  2. Jose Calderon
    June 13th, 2017 at 23:52 | #2

    Is there room for a person like me who dedicates his life to taking care of his elderly parents.
    How much does it take to get in on this project?

  3. Ann Marie Johnson
    June 15th, 2017 at 02:56 | #3

    Please send me more information……Thank you.

  1. No trackbacks yet.