Email

How You Can Profit Where This $2 Billion Oil Fund Went Under

by | published July 18th, 2017

EnerVest, an investment fund that for 25 years had been buying up oil and natural gas wells, just went from being worth $2 billion…

To basically zero.

In the process, many investors have lost stakes, including pension funds, university endowments, and some otherwise savvy market players.

What happened here shows the perils of using debt to leverage investments in energy without expert advice – something I never recommend…

And it also reveals the next big investment opportunity in U.S. oil.

Here’s what you need to know…

Things Aren’t as Easy as “Buy Low, Sell High”

Conventional wisdom has it you should “buy low, sell high.” Investment funds have certainly been following this mantra when it comes to depressed oil company assets.

Unfortunately, in some cases they make no attempt to understand the underlying market dynamics.

In recent years, several investment funds sought to buy up producing and prospective oil or natural gas wells in some of the best performing basin in the U.S.

The process began when prices were high (i.e., prior to the fourth quarter of 2014). In fact, the most spectacular collapse involves a fund that has been doing it for more than 25 years: EnerVest.

There, some $2 billion in investments has essentially been written down to zero.

EnerVest is certainly not the only fund to have seen the decline in oil prices result in intense pressure on hard asset well investments. Thus far, the others are holding on.

What sets EnerVest apart is the Houston-based fund’s decision to boost its acquisition spree with some spirited leveraging via borrowed money.

Now, creditors are attempting to take over management of the fund and determine what actually remains under a more realistic estimate of aggregate asset value.

The approach is simple enough, at least in theory. I’ve talked about it here in Oil & Energy Investor before.

Rather than acquire entire companies (with their range of debt, nonperforming holdings, idle equipment, and payrolls), focus on cherry-picking the wells themselves.

But there is a fair amount of serious and detailed study that needs to be done before any acquisitions are determined.

These Three Steps Would Have Saved EnerVest

Prior to any move, three overarching elements require careful analysis.

First, genuine wellhead costs and proceeds must be determined. These figures tell us what it costs to bring the oil or gas out of the ground compared to what can be obtained when it is sold to a wholesaler.

The wellhead price is the price in the first of a series of transactions as the resource moves from producer though a chain of wholesalers and distributors.

This wellhead price is well below the market price, and is the actual indicator of any genuine breakeven.

Second, a careful examination must be completed of the available extractable reserves. This involves the geological structure and reservoir logs of each well prior to acquisition.

Third, potential wells must be considered against likely market conditions. Considered here are pricing dynamics, expected aggregate supply, and a range of demand scenarios.

Even in a high market-price environment, all wells are hardly created equal.

Unfortunately, much of the most recent commitment of investment capital took place with WTI (West Texas Intermediate, the benchmark crude standard used to set futures contracts in New York) near or above $90 a barrel.

Today, WTI is barely half of that price.

The combination of increasing the rate of well acquisition, the higher risk that comes with using borrowed funds, a curious lack of adequate research on either sustainable production from each well or the condition of reservoirs, and the lack of any adequate provisions for pricing changes resulted in a perfect storm.

The collapse of EnerVest illustrates how this can go very wrong. It also provides a sterling example of fundamental misreads of the U.S. oil production sector. Primary among them was the incorrect view of operational debt.

Using Borrowed Money as Leverage Made Bad Deals Worse

This is also a matter comprising discussions we have had previously in Oil & Energy Investor. A number of smaller American operators have gone bust, while others have been merged into larger survivors.

As the market price continued to decline, companies became more reliant on issuing junk bonds at higher interest rates. This kind of financing cut even further into whatever narrow profit margin was still available making things worse in the long run.

This debt vulnerability provided what appeared to be a golden opportunity to acquire targeted production asset, harvesting the low hanging fruit.

Companies began selling wells in a desperate attempt to keep overall operations from sinking entirely. EnerVest and others, meanwhile, mistook this environment as a broad invitation to a fire sale.

Despite having acquired thousands of wells before the decline in prices (the fund at one point was the largest independent holder of wells in the country), it continued to add assets as the situation continued to get worse.

This was financed by increasing reliance on borrowed money. Meanwhile, the downward trajectory of the market pushed oil prices well below any breakeven for the bulk of wells in the portfolio.

That meant that what oil or gas could still be brought up fetched such a low wellhead price, it wasn’t enough to cover both field expenses and service on the funds debt.

Sources tell me that the fund started liquidating its own well assets in a futile attempt to remain ahead of this tidal wave. This is something that I have been able to verify personally in some instances.

Intermediaries began contacting me for advice on how to sell selected wells held by the fund (and others in similar circumstances).

Obviously, EnerVest expected a quicker and stronger levelling off of the price decline. That looked like it was forming earlier this year.

However, the last month brought another down swing and the fund was unable to reverse course.

The Next Investment Wave is Coming Soon

Of course, this also means that, when the dust finally settles, there will be a new round of acquiring now deeply discounted well assets.

The resources, after all, are still there to be extracted. In large measure, neither the crude oil nor the natural gas contained in the reserves have migrated anywhere.

But this next round of acquisitions will require a better strategy, requiring the three areas of analysis I mentioned earlier: determining costs, evaluating available extractable reserves, and predicting market conditions.

There’s also one more essential ingredient that I am saving until the time is appropriate…

When the time comes, you’ll hear about this fourth ingredient right here in Oil & Energy Investor.

Please Note: Kent cannot respond to your comments and questions directly. But he can address them in future alerts... so keep an eye on your inbox. If you have a question about your subscription, please email us directly at customerservice@oilandenergyinvestor.com

  1. Donald J Goyette ll
    August 21st, 2017 at 10:58 | #1

    The big oil companies will continue to milk as much money as they can from potential investors, and can control the amount of crude that actually reaches refineries.

  2. Nello
    September 3rd, 2017 at 11:30 | #2

    I’m ready for the electronic future!

  3. James Rafter
    October 9th, 2017 at 10:02 | #3

    I’m just curious what this is and how it works and what the shares cost

  4. October 31st, 2017 at 08:49 | #4

    About time we can get away from opec

  5. Isabel marino
    December 7th, 2017 at 19:35 | #5

    I want to jnvest

  6. Isabel marino
    December 7th, 2017 at 19:39 | #6

    It is about time we stop dependig
    On other countries for fuel

  1. No trackbacks yet.